this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
86 points (90.6% liked)

Privacy

32025 readers
598 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I work on a corporate laptop that has an infamous root CA certicate installed, which allows the company to intercept all my browser traffic and perform a MITM attack.

Ideally, I'd like to use the company laptop to read my own mail, access my NAS in my time off.

I fear that even if I configure containers on that laptop to run alpine + wireguard client + firefox, the traffic would still be decrypted. If so, could you explain how the wireguard handshake could be tampered with?

What about Tor in a container? Would that work or is that pointless as well?

Huge kudos if you also take the time to explain your answer.

EDIT: A lot of you suggested I use a personal device for checking mails. I will do that. Thanks for your answers!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you want to use the same physical device just put Linux on a bootable USB stick and boot off that

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Do not do this if it let's you. Its a good way to get in trouble

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I’ve done this in the past without apparent issue. Could you perhaps expand on where the risks arise here? My impression was that unless there is some independent hardware running code separate from the OS, then it would be OK?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Its likely a violation of company policy

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Let’s assume it’s allowed. Obviously it’s untrusted hardware, but for widely issued corporate PCs, what’s the risk that there would be some hardware snooping going on if you controlled the OS?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

The "snooping" is called a good security policy. Security should always come first.