51

I haven't read Saito's books, or looked too deeply into degrowth as a movement. I just read this article and thought it made some good arguments against what it claims are Saito's understandings of Marx. I'm not sure I agree with everything, but I thought it was interesting enough to share.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 12 points 7 months ago

Degrowth is essentially a strategy of cutting back on energy inputs in order to prevent catastrophic climate change. It simply described a possible pathway to stay below 1.5°C of warming. I use the past tense because we already passed that threshold unfortunately. What you're calling degrowth is instead that catastrophic climate change will destroy the material basis for our current modern civilization, thus reducing energy inputs (and presumably ending further anthropogenic warming).

So, I think these are quite different. Strategy to avoid apocalypse vs result of apocalypse

[-] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 14 points 7 months ago

Intentional degrowth on terms we make ourselves, versus sudden emergent degrowth from critical existence failure.

this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
51 points (100.0% liked)

marxism

3657 readers
1 users here now

For the study of Marxism, and all the tendencies that fall beneath it.

Read Lenin.

Resources below are from r/communism101. Post suggestions for better resources and we'll update them.

Study Guides

Explanations

Libraries

Bookstores

Book PDFs

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS