this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
64 points (84.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35826 readers
1079 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The closest word I can think of is a sycophant but that's too strong word and not exactly what I'm looking for. The word I'm thinking of has negative connotations and it's for someone who is friends with different groups but only at a superficial level and isn't necessarily honest about who all they're friends with. This person would be seen as untrustworthy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kanzar@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Ex-cons might not be the best group to use in your example...

If I had a friend who kept the company of fascists, I'd probably drop them real quick - notably as the current iteration of fascists are intent on ensuring people like me are dead or ground under their boot.

On the flip side, just because I had a disagreement with someone doesn't mean other friends can't be friends with that someone - it takes a lot to be called "an enemy" of myself.

[–] Dnn@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If I had a friend who kept the company of fascists, I'd probably drop them real quick

Not a good way to make them see reason. I know it's hypothetical but if you're friends shouldn't you put in some effort to help instead of just drop them?

[–] Kanzar@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Given how out and proud the sentiments are expressed, the friend can't say they didn't know... I wouldn't waste much time trying to have them see reason. You don't accidentally join a dinner party where everyone else is a white supremacist, or an anti-vaxxer, or where everything they don't like is woke and thus should be eliminated.

Either way I said probably... Which would likely follow as certainly after an attempt to see if maybe they have been wilfully ignorant (still not a good look).

[–] thantik@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Why? If they're Ex-cons, they've done their time and they deserve to be treated the same as everyone else.

They're a perfect group to use in my example.

And there are very few actual fascists out there. If you've used that word more than twice this week, it might be a you problem.

[–] Kanzar@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

It's precisely that they should be treated the same that I don't believe they make a good example as someone you wouldn't want to be associating with.

You shouldn't care that mates of yours hang with ex-cons, so there is no conflict to be had there.

I wasn't remarking on the incidence rate of fascists, merely commenting on their views.