Technology

59596 readers

3323 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

377

Redditors Vent and Complain When People Mock Their "AI Art" (futurism.com)

submitted 8 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

253 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Setting aside the usual arguments on the anti- and pro-AI art debate and the nature of creativity itself, perhaps the negative reaction that the Redditor encountered is part of a sea change in opinion among many people that think corporate AI platforms are exploitive and extractive in nature because their datasets rely on copyrighted material without the original artists' permission. And that's without getting into AI's negative drag on the environment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] littletranspunk@lemmus.org -1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

AI doesn't exist, it's all machine learning or LLMs.

They're just self-glorified public domain contributors.

There is no AI art

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Despite what people with no knowledge of the field will tell you, Machine Learning and LLMs fall under the category of AI. What you're looking for is a very specific type of AI. If AI art doesn't exist, it would be because the art usually doesn't have meaning or effort, not because AI doesn't exist.

[–] Esqplorer@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago

Intelligence is the misnomer. It's like calling airplanes 'artificial birds' (credit Don Norman).

[–] littletranspunk@lemmus.org 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

~~Humans create art, AI generates images based on other's art.~~

~~AI art is a contradiction in its own wording.~~

~~There is no AI art, just large collections of public domain images labeled as "AI art"~~

I misread, just woke up.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 8 months ago

The field of AI would never develop if everything they made along the way had to be thrown away as "not real AI".

At one point, getting computers to understand the rules of chess at all was part of the AI field. So was Conway's Game of Life, which uses a few simple rules to simulate cellular organisms and create some fascinating patterns. Optimizing compilers and virtual machines also came out of AI research.

The "not real AI" meme has no basis in the history of the field.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

General AI doesn't exist. Intelligent systems and agents very much do exist.