this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
345 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

59329 readers
4477 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
345
Google will start showing AI-powered search results to users who didn't opt in (www.engadget.com)
submitted 7 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
70 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

If you're in the US, you might see a new shaded section at the top of your Google Search results with a summary answering your inquiry, along with links for more information. That section, generated by Google's generative AI technology, used to appear only if you've opted into the Search Generative Experience(SGE) in the Search Labs platform. Now, according to Search Engine Land, Google has started adding the experience on a "subset of queries, on a small percentage of search traffic in the US." And that is why you could be getting Google's experimental AI-generated section even if you haven't switched it on.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Almost every time I ask a direct question, the two AI answers almost always directly contradict each other. Yesterday I asked if vinegar cuts grease. I received explanations for both why its an excellent grease cutter, and why it doesn't because it's an acid.

[–] time_fo_that@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I think this will be a major issue with AI. Just because it was trained on a huge wealth of knowledge doesn't mean that it was trained on correct knowledge.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Just because it was trained on a huge wealth of knowledge doesn't mean that it was trained on correct knowledge.

Which makes its correct answers and it's confidently wrong answers look as plausible as each other. One needs to apply real intelligence to determine which to trust, makikg the AI tool mostly useless.

[–] sc_griffith@awful.systems 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I don't see any reason being trained on writing informed by correct knowledge would cause it to be correct frequently. unless you're expecting it to just verbatim lift sentences from training data

[–] Murdoc@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago

Showing different viewpoints in order to not appear biased. It's the cornerstone of democracy after all.

😛