50
submitted 5 months ago by tree@lemmy.zip to c/indigenous@hexbear.net

The work is unfolding as global instability and growing demand drive uranium prices higher


The largest uranium producer in the United States is ramping up work just south of Grand Canyon National Park on a long-contested project that largely has sat dormant since the 1980s.

The work is unfolding as global instability and growing demand drive uranium prices higher.

The Biden administration and dozens of other countries have pledged to triple the capacity of nuclear power worldwide in their battle against climate change, ensuring uranium will remain a key commodity for decades as the government offers incentives for developing the next generation of nuclear reactors and new policies take aim at Russia's influence over the supply chain.

But as the U.S. pursues its nuclear power potential, environmentalists and Native American leaders remain fearful of the consequences for communities near mining and milling sites in the West and are demanding better regulatory oversight.

Producers say uranium production today is different than decades ago when the country was racing to build up its nuclear arsenal. Those efforts during World War II and the Cold War left a legacy of death, disease and contamination on the Navajo Nation and in other communities across the country, making any new development of the ore a hard pill to swallow for many.

read more: https://ictnews.org/news/uranium-is-being-mined-near-the-grand-canyon-as-prices-soar

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] blobjim@hexbear.net 5 points 5 months ago

It's not like there's an "indigenous-people-friendly" form of extraction. In Bolivia there has even been contention between indigenous groups and the indigenous-led (I think?) government over proposed resource extraction projects.

[-] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 3 points 5 months ago

It's not like there's an "indigenous-people-friendly" form of extraction.

Eh this feels strongly like an 'easier to imagine the end of the world' take, there are better and worse forms of and places for extraction. And I'm sure that contention in Bolivia is preferable to the brutal conditions people faced under the short-lived western-backed christofash regime a few years back.

That doesn't mean it's perfect. Another example is succdem AMLO doing an extractive colonial rail infra project in Chiapas. Hopefully through pushback those slightly less shitty guvmints will do better, and if not be replaced by one that does.

[-] blobjim@hexbear.net 4 points 5 months ago

I think it's naive to think you can do resource extraction without the negative effects of it. That just isn't something that exists. You have to tear up massive amounts of land using massive amounts of energy.

[-] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 3 points 5 months ago

ok, but the alternative is anprim shit or some start trek sci fi shit so idk what to tell you. resource extraction will happen, and fighting it outright is tilting at windmills

[-] blobjim@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago
[-] erik_houdini@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 5 months ago
[-] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 1 points 5 months ago

which is malthusian nonsense that's just a subgenre of either the anprim shit or star trek sci fi shit I mentioned, idk what to tell you

[-] erik_houdini@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 5 months ago

economic de growth isn't maluthsian lol, cope and consumer harder, when's the new iphone coming out?

this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
50 points (100.0% liked)

indigenous

571 readers
45 users here now

Welcome to c/indigenous, a socialist decolonial community for news and discussion concerning Indigenous peoples.

Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Post memes, art, articles, questions, anything you'd like as long as it's about Indigenous peoples.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS