solarpunk memes

2927 readers

1078 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

ex_06@slrpnk.net

tsugu@slrpnk.net

Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net

680

You crazies actually trust the Sun to be there when you need it?! Ha! (i.postimg.cc)

submitted 7 months ago by ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to c/memes@slrpnk.net

112 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Kayday@lemmy.world 53 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

The US used over 3.6 million gigawatts hours of energy in 2020. If you round down, and assume no increase in the last 4 years, that's over 9800 per day. 30 is a drop in the bucket. We have combined cycle natural gas plants, along with other green options to pick up for dips in production exactly like this.

A better question is how much energy we gain from solar if losing it for a couple hours once a decade or so is such a big deal.

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 26 points 7 months ago

Or how much power was saved because people were outside watching and not inside consuming power.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 18 points 7 months ago (2 children)

He didn't write GWH, he just said GW. For all we know, assuming this number relates to reality at all, that's just smear across the whole eclipse and no single watt was lost for more than a few minutes.

If we lost "30GW", I'd bet we lost barely one GWH.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I think a safer assumption is that he made it all up, because truth is dead.

We lost some amount. Did he bother to google how much? Why would he?

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If it really was GW, then just multiply the 30 with time the sun was covered, and boom, you have GWH. I don't think it was even close to an hour.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I was in the penumbra, and around here I would say the entire event took an hour and a half, from "any of the sun at all is covered" to "none of the sun at all is covered." I'm sure our local solar panels did dip in output, probably to the point of producing no useful power for several minutes as it got noticeably darker.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago

I see, given the worst case scenario of 1.5h coverage, with the average of 50% coverage, gives about 30*1.5=22.5 GWH.