EVs are lowering Bay Area's carbon footprint (news.berkeley.edu)

submitted 6 months ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/environment@beehaw.org

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

these of course come with their own tradeoffs, but you take what you can get

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] sqgl@beehaw.org 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Not everyone can afford an EV. Not everyone can practically ride a bike to work. Seems to me like the two could complement each other. Currently though there are people driving who could be cycling.

[-] TehPers@beehaw.org 4 points 6 months ago

Both would be good, one does not need to exclude the other. Neither is going to be enough on its own though. More EV availability would overall reduce carbon footprint, but more can be reduced by increasing biking availability and encouraging it more where possible.

I can say from experience though that the $40+/hr parking in some areas of SF make me never want to drive there again though. BART does help though, since you can get around SF pretty well on public transit alone. Other cities in the area also benefit from BART, but not as much, and could generally have better public transportation (busses and such).

this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024

53 points (100.0% liked)

Environment

3916 readers

10 users here now

Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).

See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS