this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
578 points (94.1% liked)

Comics

5918 readers
121 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You'd be fuckin surprised actually, some of these people will support their own family while condemning others for doing the same thing. Dick Cheney has a daughter who he is supposedly very close to who is publicly lesbian, married to a woman and he himself supported their marriage and attended. He then turns around and supports banning gay marriage. I may be under informed on this situation but it's baffling to me.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It becomes less baffling when you realize they are of the mindset that the ones making the laws are inherently different and the laws don't apply. That they're making those laws "for their own good"(meaning the people not lawmakers).

It's confusing, and essentially cognitive dissonance, but it's definitely there.

"Conservatism consists of one policy, to wit: There are those that the law protects but does not bind, and those that the law binds but does not protect."

[–] DivineDev@kbin.run 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)

No no, I find this completely believable. It's like lacking a consistent moral system is a requirement for being conservative.

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It does rather depend on whether politicians are there to enact whatever they want, or to enact the will of the people, and what they should do where those two don't align. You probably wouldn't consider it immoral for someone who doesn't drive to vote one way or another on a roadbuilding project, or for someone without kids to vote on a school project.

So I don't see why it should be a problem for a politician who privately supports a particular topic but represents people who don't, to vote against it; it means they're doing what they were elected to do and not acting solely in their own interests.

[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That's all well and good but this is talking about gay marriage which is a topic with completely different context and importance than building roads or schools

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago

go figure a lot of them depend on religion to tell them what's moral and not