People Twitter

5210 readers

1495 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1135

A shadow of his former self (lemmy.world)

submitted 6 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

178 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MalachaiConstant@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago (3 children)

My guess is this saved somebody money.

Simpler design = fewer colors = lower printing cost.

Sometimes this can just be ink cost. Sometimes it can make discrepancies between printers less noticable.

Could still be the other things too

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I heard somewhere before that often these simplistic logo changes are due to how they look on thumbnails, mobile devices etc. Unsure of the evidence there but it made sense to me. I still hate it though.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Can't wait to download My Captain Morgan app and... Drink?

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

Lol like when the iPhone was first getting big and there was those "drinking apps" where you turn the screen and pretend to drink.

[–] fhqwgads@possumpat.io 16 points 6 months ago

Generally it's not much savings if any to do more than 1 spot color instead of full process cmyk. It might even be more expensive since it's a new setup for the printer. Given the volumes they're printing at it's probably basically a wash.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Okay but then why is he less buff??

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

Less ink, obviously