this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
79 points (100.0% liked)

Labour

7759 readers
4 users here now

One big comm for one big union! Post union / labour related news, memes, questions, guides, etc.

Here Are Some Resources to help with organizing and direct action

:red-fist:

And More to Come!

If you want to speak to a union organizer, reach out here.

:iww: :big-bill: :sabo:

Rules:

  1. Follow The Hexbear Code of Conduct.

  2. No anti-union content, especially from the right. Critiques and discussions of different organizing strategies is fine.

  3. Don’t dox yourself or others.

  4. Labour Party content goes in !electoralism@www.hexbear.net, !politics@www.hexbear.net, or a :dumpster-fire:.

When we fight we win!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

American workers had begun organizing into unions following the Civil War, and by the 1880s many thousands were organized into unions, most notably the ​Knights of Labor.

In the spring of 1886 workers struck at the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company in Chicago, the factory that made farm equipment including the famous McCormick Reaper made by Cyrus McCormick. The workers on strike demanded an eight-hour workday, at a time when 60-hour workweeks were common. The company locked out the workers and hired strikebreakers, a common practice at the time.

On May 1, 1886, a large May Day parade was held in Chicago, and two days later, a protest outside the McCormick plant resulted in a person being killed.

A mass meeting was called to take place on May 4, to protest what was seen as brutality by the police. The location for the meeting was to be Haymarket Square in Chicago, an open area used for public markets.

At the May 4th meeting a number of radical and anarchist speakers addressed a crowd of approximately 1,500 people. The meeting was peaceful, but the mood became confrontational when the police tried to disperse the crowd.

As scuffles broke out, a powerful bomb was thrown. The bomb landed and exploded, unleashing shrapnel. The police drew their weapons and fired into the panicked crowd.

Seven policemen were killed, and it’s likely that most of them died from police bullets fired in the chaos, not from the bomb itself. Four civilians were also killed. More than 100 persons were injured.

The public outcry was enormous. Press coverage contributed to a mood of hysteria. Two weeks later, the cover of Frank Leslie's Illustrated Magazine, one of the most popular publications in the US, featured an illustration of the "bomb thrown by anarchists" cutting down police and a drawing of a priest giving the last rites to a wounded officer in a nearby police station.

The rioting was blamed on the labor movement, specifically on the Knights of Labor, the largest labor union in the United States at the time. Widely discredited, fairly or not, the Knights of Labor never recovered.

Newspapers throughout the US denounced “anarchists,” and advocated hanging those responsible for the Haymarket Riot. A number of arrests were made, and charges were brought against eight men.

The trial of the anarchists in Chicago was a spectacle lasting for much of the summer, from late June to late August of 1886. Despite a glaring lack of evidence linking the anarchists to the bombing, all eight were convicted and sentenced to death by the illustrious Governor Richard Oglesby.

For the first meeting of the foundation of the second international the American Federation of Labor would choose May 1 to commemorate a general strike in the United States, which had begun on 1 May 1886 and culminated in the Haymarket affair four days later.

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KittyBobo@hexbear.net 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

What genuinely interests me is fetishes and sexual pathology. What people are in to and the material reasons that might give rise to certain interests. I wish I had more judgement-free spaces to discuss these topics, but it seems like in leftist spaces there's this disconnect where on one hand we're very pro-LGBT, kink should be at pride, sex work is work, but on the other hand what you're in to is gross, problematic, and/or should be kept behind closed doors you freak. Oh, we love weird, just not...y'know...weird.

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

I enjoy discussing and reading about weird kink things in the abstract I guess, at a remove, but people do not really separate it from their horniness, which makes sense I guess, but it means I can't really talk about spider lady sex without somebody going all panting y'know. Not real surprising ig.

However I also support volcel-judge uncritically. Do other leftist spaces tend to brand you weird/gross/problematic?

[–] KittyBobo@hexbear.net 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What most interests me lately is how fear interacts with sexual desire. Fear and anxiety are like a mental friction, and what is sex and getting off if not friction with a little lube? Like we see a lot about racist white people getting off to racial cuckolding porn or how trans porn is so prevalent in transphobic states, but I wonder if this happens on the other side of politics. Are there people who are in to Nazi uniform fetishes not because they are fascist but rather because they're afraid of the growing fascism in the world? Or like how Tom of Finland and a lot of early gay culture incorporated police uniforms or Nazi adjacent black leather as a way of appropriating oppressive ideologies for kinky and open sexual expression. I can't really bring myself to say "you can't like X because it's problematic for Y reason", but I do think it's an interesting thing people should feel open and willing to interrogate about themselves. It's all brain worms placed there because of the material conditions we have, those worms are an expression of trying to work through anxieties and fears and depression about sex and gender and I wish there were judgement-free place to just come out and say "here are my brain worms, here's what I think it says about me!" in a space that isn't explicitly for porn where people typically aren't interested in the "why" and just want to get off without thinking about it.

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 9 points 7 months ago

Fear and anxiety are like a mental friction, and what is sex and getting off if not friction with a little lube?

he-laughed

Well uh, guess what, I once knew a commie lady who was really into "fashy daddy" stuff, like full-tilt 1930s uniform shit. I guess it coulda been her way of processing the encroachment of the right wing in a safe environment, and maybe defanging it a bit internally... with sex, lol. I think people can like X if it's problematic for Y reason but they're interacting with it in a way that's good for them. Leather is a core part of queer culture now :)

Yeah these are neat brainworms, and actually I sympathise with your desire for this sort of space. I guess it'd be too much for the volcel cops, but a healthy discussion forum of that sort should definitely exist, ngl.

[–] theposterformerlyknownasgood@hexbear.net 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] VOLCEL_POLICE@hexbear.net 2 points 7 months ago

The VOLCEL POLICE are on the scene! PLEASE KEEP YOUR VITAL ESSENCES TO YOURSELVES AT ALL TIMES.

نحن شرطة VolCel.بناءا على تعليمات الهيئة لترويج لألعاب الفيديو و النهي عن الجنس نرجوا الإبتعاد عن أي أفكار جنسية و الحفاظ على حيواناتكم المنويَّة حتى يوم الحساب. اتقوا الله، إنك لا تراه لكنه يراك.

volcel-police

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think there's a thing where people are just so goddamn excited to have a chance to talk about something they're in to where they won't face immediate social ostracism or physical danger, that they get too excited.

Like you get to take off your mask and/or armor for a second and everything kind of comes spilling out. You never get to talk about it at all so you've never had a chance to really learn what is an "acceptable" amount of excited to be when you finally get to discuss people sitting on cakes or whatever your thing is.

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

side-eye-1 You never see me do that on here, yeah I would never do that. Drop the mask in excitement for yelling about something I never get to talk about, haha.. I would not write essays about rare topics, noooo... side-eye-2

And honestly, what I mean more specifically in this case, is that people tend to express their lust at me, which I'm sure there are people who're cool with that, that's not inherently a problem but personally, for me, I will run away. There's no reaction apt for that, time to bail Idk.

nsfw, cursedThere might be stuff about Nameless Queen that's worth discussing, but I've never mentioned it and not had the conversation go "god I wish an eternal spider demigoddess would choose me as her foremost concubine and use her cold, chitinous ovipositor to fill my ass with her warm, sticky brood" so y'know! Not super productive!

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I just want to be Odo from Deep Space Nine for a day. Imagine

spoilerTransforming into four penises phoenix-think

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 3 points 7 months ago

Imagine sitting in a bucket with no muscles or joints or bones to hurt, just vibing.

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 6 points 7 months ago

I just prefer to not dwell on the specifics of whatever weird shit anyone's in to lol

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 4 points 7 months ago

I object to the term "sexual pathology". I think we should divide it in to "cool weird sex shit" and "crimes".

And, yes, the neo-puritanism and sex shaming and general policing of sexual behavior in some spaces is concerning and/or reactionary.

I say, as I go to make a volcel-judge joke.