this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
182 points (91.4% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4000 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ech@lemm.ee 29 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I'm not gonna pretend he deserves anyone's pity or that you should change your opinion here, but acting like 18 is some magic age where someone is suddenly completely responsible and free of childish impulses/problems is ridiculous. Society may need to set an age for accountability in a legal sense, but socially, humans just don't work that way.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 51 points 6 months ago (3 children)

At 18, he’s legally free to walk away from his shit-for-brains father and make his own choices.

He chooses nepotism. He may not be totally mature, but they are his choice.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He’d be free to walk, taking a leap into the unknown at the cost of losing almost everything he has. Expecting that sort of heroic act of him is not entirely reasonable.

OTOH, judging by the photos, he does give off Brock Turner/Kyle Rittenhouse vibes. If, having grown up where he did, he turned out to be an aggressive predator, it would not be a huge surprise.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

I’m almost certain he’d be able to land on his feet.

Almost any publisher would pay rights for “growing up trump”, for example.

I wouldn’t have expected him to totally walk away… but his choices are now his to make in a way they weren’t before.

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Also, why do we act like 18 is the magic minimum age when someone should know better? I remember being 15, 16, 17 and having a solid understanding of morals and how to participate in society. I wasn't special.

It's not "You're 18 now, so you should know better." It's "For fucks sake, you're 18. You should have figured this shit out years ago."

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

Dude exactly. At the time I understood I didn't know shit but I understood nonetheless and that helped me make decisions about how to act and what to do in society and how I was perceived by those around me. We were young and ignorant not stupid.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Because it needs to be somewhere. It’s basically arbitrary

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The point I'm making is we set 18 as the age when you're responsible for your own actions, but it's not because just in that moment you become responsible.

We set the age at 18 because it's a really generous guess. Most people understand how to interact with others years before their 18th birthday. If someone is still fucking up at 18 then consequences are appropriate.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The point I’m making is we set 18 as the age when you’re responsible for your own actions, but it’s not because just in that moment you become responsible.

Legally.... yes. it is where you become responsible.
Mentally, emotionally, and any other way? you're right. there is no single age. But the law can't really make fluid distinctions like that without becoming an unweildly mess. So we get one age, everyone younger than that (*) is not a legal adult and everyone older is. that's how it is, and yes, its pretty much an arbitrary decision that was made ages ago.

(* there is a process where children can become emancipated and have no guardians, taking legal responsibility for themselves. but it's extremely rare for courts to grant it. usually they just dump the kid into the system if there's cause.)

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

We weren't talking about legal responsibility in this thread, were we?

The above conversation seemed to be about the social consequences Barron should face for choosing to be part of this mess, right?

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

It took me well into my 30s to walk away from religion. Especially in an isolated environment, it's likely he doesn't really understand his choices, and though he has had a much more comfortable way of life than us, it's still hard to transition to a much less forgiving way of life. I had to leave behind friends and family I still wish I had a good relationship with, but the cultlike environment (JW) is specifically designed to discourage leaving. Learning about other viewpoints are heavily discouraged, as is associating with people not in the same belief structure.

While mine was religion, with how polarizing his father is and the protection needed, I don't doubt he had even less access to other people and viewpoints than I did. I at least got to meet people online, at work,and through shows (funny enough, Futurama was a huge part of breaking me away) to get some other viewpoints, but some of my friends were homeschooled and wouldn't watch or be allowed to watch almost anything secular.

It's why so many are afraid to allow kids to go to college (pretty discouraged by JW also), because they might change. I say at 18 the chance of someone in his position being able to get alternative experiences is slim to none.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 29 points 6 months ago (2 children)

He’s not a minor anymore and he can make decisions to be in politics or not. That’s my point. He was totally unknown until now. I was HOPING he would disown his family. But, apparently they’re all insane.

[–] Impound4017@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Definitely agree, but for what it’s worth, I certainly didn’t stop being a dumbass teenager the moment I turned 18.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Well, true, but until now we haven’t heard much about him. I guess what I’m saying is, I didn’t want to judge anybody before they did something wrong. It wouldn’t really be very nice to assume he would be the same way. After all, his childhood would have been very different than Trump‘s previous children. Maybe his friends convinced him to be rational.

Guess not

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but he made a choice there. And for that choice he deserves to be criticised.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

IDK, the power that people have over him is probably way too much. 18 year olds are still highly influenceable and he's likely under a lot of pressure from his family and their political cohort to join in.

Try saying no to those people, he'd likely lose everything.

[–] Alto@kbin.social 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Especially when you have constant pressure to be that way from everyone around you. Truth be told, I've always just felt bad for the kid. Sure we're to the point where you've gotta expect him to at least start thinking for himself, but that type of deprogramming takes a long ass time.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

Well, feel bad until he starts slamming minorities.