221
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 16 points 5 months ago

I do not understand why people continue to trust Proton. They seem no better than Gmail from where I sit.

[-] Jako301@feddit.de 67 points 5 months ago

Proton upheld their claim of privacy, no Emails were disclosed. But they never promised anonymity cause that's something they simply can't do under the Swiss law. If you willingly give them your other mail addresses or contact details, they have to comply. Sure they could have denied the Spanish authorities, but it takes less than a week to get a court order for things like this.

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 24 points 5 months ago

And if they didn’t require that secondary email address or would allow a temporary, they would have had nothing to give in the first place.

Proton aren’t the victim here.

[-] Alk@lemmy.world 42 points 5 months ago

They don't require a secondary email address.

[-] Baku@aussie.zone 4 points 5 months ago

They do in certain cases. If you sign up through a VPN or Tor, they require you to provide a recovery email. They don't accept temporary email addresses, and even if you don't sign up work a VPN, they'll still collect and be obligated to hand over your IP

[-] kingster@lemmy.world 36 points 5 months ago

Proton doesn't require a recovery email.

Proton isn't the victim, but they aren't at fault either.

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 20 points 5 months ago

Oh yes because you HAVE to give them your real.name@gmail address. Very cool and privacy focused.

Suspect knew what info he had put where. Poor OPSEC.

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 8 points 5 months ago

Yes, as the reporter demonstrated, you have to give them a second email address. Or did I miss your point?

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

I think you missed their point. You don't have to give them anything related to or connected to your real name or identity.

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 3 points 5 months ago
[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 38 points 5 months ago

Then you are ignorant.

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone 25 points 5 months ago

Comments like this are why no one takes privacy advocates seriously. Really? No better than Google? You guys are fucking delusional.

[-] requiem@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

Depends in what field. Proton, at least, doesn’t scan your email contents and metadata to sell it on to advertisers.

[-] something_random_tho@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

FWIW Gmail no longer sells your email data to advertisers either. That changed years back.

[-] KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 months ago

I'm gonna need some evidence before I believe Google isn't analyzing all the data that passes through it unencrypted.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 2 points 5 months ago

All data sent through protons mta is also unencrypted. That's how mail mtas function.

[-] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 6 points 5 months ago

Google doesn't sell your data because they don't need to. They take the data and use something called Real Time Bidding that also skirts GDPR and data protection laws/best practices.

People in this thread are really showing their ass about how little they know about how their data is actually being collected and protected. Sure, Proton isn't 100% private, but to say Proton and Gmail are on the same levels of consumer protection is hilarious.

[-] summerof69@lemm.ee 20 points 5 months ago

I don't think that Proton sells my data to advertisers or trains AI using my emails and documents. As of laws, unfortunately any service in any reputable country has to obey them. You can always buy a server in some banana republic and set up an email service there, but even then there are some risks.

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 3 points 5 months ago

All good unrelated points.

With Proton’s anti-privacy requirements for establishing service, they don’t deserve anyone’s trust. They’re just a LEO honeypot that charges you to get in. Again, in that regard, you may as well stick with free Google. At least they’re (mostly) honest about what they are.

[-] independantiste@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

How is proton being dishonest here? I'd like to read your point. They never pitched themselves as a way to protect yourself from the law, they always clearly said they are a confidential email provider, meaning they don't know what you are sending and receiving. It works like a doctor meeting, the information is very confidential, but not anonymous, it is tied to you even though nobody except authorized parties should be able to access this info.

[-] Rogers@lemmy.ml 18 points 5 months ago

Way way better than gmail IMO. One simple reason is if you have something wrong with your account you can get in contact with a real human. And still better data protection than anything in the US. I'm not a journalist or freedom fighter so for my use case it's ideal.

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 3 points 5 months ago

Fair point. And if whatever you want to keep private isn't likely to get you killed, then Proton is probably as good as any.

[-] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Because we can see through the clickbait to what actually happened.

this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
221 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy Guides

16749 readers
1 users here now

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS