this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
35 points (92.7% liked)
Starfield
2861 readers
6 users here now
Welcome to the Starfield community on Lemmy.zip!
- Follow instance rules (no spam, keep it civil and respectful, be constructive, tag NSFW)
Helpful links:
Spoiler policy:
- No spoilers in titles; if you want to share images with spoilers, preferably post the image in the body of the post. If you do make an image post, mark it NSFW.
- Add
[Spoilers]to your title if there will be untagged spoilers in the post. - Game mechanics and general discoveries (ship parts, weapons, etc) don't need a spoiler tag.
- Details about questlines and other story related content are spoilers. Use your best judgement!
Post & comment spoiler syntax:
<spoiler here>
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They need a Cyberpunk 2077/ No man's sky level overhaul and that simply won't happen.
In Cyberpunk's case, CDPR within months of the terrible launch, had a clear vision of what they want to fix and how they want their game to feel in 2.0. They gave us a roadmap and plenty of updates and they delivered on what they promised with an incredible 2.0 release and DLC, that honestly propelled the game into my top 10 of all time.
No man's sky basically released a new game in the decrepit shell of their initial release. Multiple decent DLC's later and it's one of the best success stories in gaming history.
With their Elden Ring title on the horizon, there's no way Bethesda is going to devote so many resources to fix a broken game. They also promised that Starfield will run in a new engine following backlash when they said it'll run on the same one. There's very little confidence now in Bethesda that their next game won't be a buggy mess. Fallout 4 sucked until mods fixed the game. Starfield sucks to this day and their next title probably already has significant development done to it that they likely can't scrap lol.
If they honestly thought this patch would bring people back, then they're as deluded as the diablo 4 devs are
No they didn't.
So what am I remembering then? Was that fallout76?
They had a new game coming up and said they'll be using their engine and there was a huge backlash, and they then responded that they'll be working on a new one.
I could've sworn my worst enemy's right arm that that's how it happened... Internet's slow right now on the train but I'm keen to do some sleuthing on this now
Both were always creation engine. They were lambasted and memed on a few times due to how shit and dated it is.
You are probably remembering that they announced extensive updates to their Creation Engine which is why they call it Creation Engine 2 now.
if no mans sky can make a comback starfield can too. i think itd be a whole lot harder to make no mans sky good vs starfield