this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
291 points (99.3% liked)

Fediverse

28382 readers
656 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Xylinna@lemmy.world
MrCenny@lemmy.world
TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
automodbeta@lemmy.world
woelkchen@lemmy.world
291
Lemmy community discoverability is not user-friendly and can be improved App side (lemmy.zip)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by MrSoup@lemmy.zip to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
55 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I've introduced two of my friends (not into tech) to Lemmy. Since they're not into tech this is their first web forum.

I've explained the federation thru the usual email metaphore and that's ok, but to lookup for communities is not quite there on client side.

Let me explain.
He wanted to see all the communities on an instance because that instance is in his native language but he's registered on another instance. So to see all those communities you must go on instance.domain/communities, copy the name of the community you are interessed in and paste it inside the app/web client to look it up.

And to see all the communities all over the fediverse you must use lemmyverse.net which is a cool site, but still you got to copy paste back and forth to the app.

This could be implementend inside app itself by listing all communities and add ability to filter by things like instance.

Obviously open to discussion about the issue itself and how that could be improved.

Feel free to tag apps/clients devs to ear their opinion too.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Without content addressing that's almost impossible

[–] NatoBoram@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You can't have content addressing because it's mutable. On the other hand, UUIDs are made for that. There's even multiple types of UUIDs made for distributed computing with namespaces and such.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 months ago

Bluesky does strict content addressing with hashes plus post ID (unique per repository, this allows edits). So you can choose which version to refer to. If you need to archive or mirror stuff you can use the hash, and threads can have both methods so you can see which version of a comment somebody replied to, etc.