this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
-24 points (25.0% liked)

Technology

59378 readers
3148 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] restingboredface@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The title of this article is misleading. It's actually a nice summary in how AI firms have conveniently forgotten their own warnings and predictions of the dangers of AI now that they no longer need to use that messaging in making pitches to investors.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I guess they realized they were only hurting themselves when the government wouldn't obey them and ban all the competition just because they said "AI danger".

It was clearly all a ploy to begin with.

[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

What do all the people downvoting it based on the title assume it means?

[–] restingboredface@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

My thinking is that it reads like the author is dismissing the whole notion that AI has risks and that the folks raising concerns were just repeating an overblown doomsday narrative.

That's what I thought and I expected to see a lot of promoting for the shiny new things and dismissing safety efforts as dampening innovation.

[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

This is what the world is now. TL:DR, must react.