this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2024
1204 points (98.3% liked)

memes

10191 readers
2154 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] promitheas@programming.dev 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think it refers to producing a single baby, rather than just a baby every month

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, which is why I phrased my statement as "Well, ... could..." to indicate an alternative perspective. This was to illustrate that sometimes pithy reductive quips can be based on overly reductive assumptions. Maybe it is the case that a single baby is all that's required, but maybe the author misunderstood the goal.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In this fictional scenario of the author's creation? That just demonstrates the converse - that sometimes simple ideas will be deliberately misinterpreted in a convoluted way, to prove someone else's point.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works -2 points 5 months ago

In this fictional scenario of the author's creation?

So a straw man? Or are we supposed to infer that this is an illustrative example of actual behavior?