this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
416 points (89.2% liked)

Technology

59190 readers
3487 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Kaspersky uncovered iOS vulnerabilities in 'Operation Triangulation', reported to Apple, but was refused bounty payment
  • Apple's Security Bounty Program offers rewards up to $1 million for discovering vulnerabilities to prevent them from being sold on the dark web
  • Apple's refusal to pay Kaspersky could be due to restrictions on financial transactions with companies in sanctioned countries like Russia.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mindlight@lemm.ee 61 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Apple could have tried to work with them and said something like "We'll pay when the embargo ends"

.....aaaaand that would most likely be trying to circumvent the sanctions by essentially receiving credit from Kaspersky on delivered services.

Not saying the situation is optional, but the sanctions would be extremely toothless if it was that easy to circumvent.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago (2 children)

How is holding the money until (and if) the sanctions are lifted, "circumventing"?

However unlikely it would be, if the sanctions are lifted (maybe Russia gets a new, sane Government, calls off its invasion, stops its international shenanigans), wouldn't it be OK to pay this company then?

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 23 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It would still probably count as some sort of trade (even when delayed), which is what would violate the sanctions.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

It could be argued that such delayed trade should be encouraged. Let Apple's debt to Kaspersky build up, with interest, but it'll only be paid once sanctions end which will only happen once pre-determined conditions are met. It's basically an increasing incentive to change course in a way that will result in sanctions being lifted.

There are probably some pretty severe downsides to this approach though.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 months ago

If the point of the embargo is to pressure affected parties to enact change on the governments policies, offering the reward after sanctions are lifted would be an added incentive.

It should be allowed or even encouraged to help the power of the sanctions.

[–] mindlight@lemm.ee 14 points 5 months ago

In many cases it's doing business and not just the payment!/compansation that the sanctions is about.