this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
804 points (99.8% liked)

World News

39019 readers
2148 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zabadoh@ani.social -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

~~In this case, I can believe that Chiquita didn't set out to finance the AUC, but was unfortunate in that their banana plantations fell into AUC-controlled territory, and therefore were extorted for protection money.~~

~~It's like if I owned an Italian restaurant, the mafia comes in and extorts me for protection money, then the feds come and arrest me for financing the mafia. What was I supposed to do?~~

edit: I didn't know about Chiquita. Thanks for the replies and info!

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

No, it's like if you owned a massive chain of Italian restaurants that notoriously exploited people, and you were actively paying the mafia to intimidate your workers and to bust unions.

The judge saw through Chiquita's ridiculous fabrication, I'm disappointed to see you parroting it here.

[–] goldenbug@fedia.io 10 points 5 months ago

There is enough proof in the trials to show they were not unhappily contributing to paramilitary groups.

[–] WhatIsThePointAnyway@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Chiquita / United Fruit have long been involved in oppressing and destabilizing south America for profit.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Chiquita has been bad for a long, long time. Even among the banana companies, they're famously evil.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It's a false analogy. Chiquita were paying the paramilitary to do its bidding.

Here is a more in-depth article.

[–] zabadoh@ani.social -4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

~~Enjoy your burned out restaurant...~~

edit: I retract my comment due to prior ignorance about Chiquita's corporate behavior.