Not The Onion

12314 readers

469 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

687

The Supreme Court rules that state officials can engage in a little corruption, as a treat (www.vox.com)

submitted 4 months ago by MHLoppy@fedia.io to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Snyder v. US is the Republican justices’ latest decision weakening anti-corruption laws.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 31 points 4 months ago

'That statute prohibits state officials from “corruptly” accepting “anything of value from any person, intending to be influenced or rewarded” for an official act.'

This is quite literally the 'textualists' ignoring the text of the law. Creatively redefining what 'rewarded' means. Jackson's dissent is basically 'Did you read the text?', 'Do you think Congress knows what words mean?', and 'Do you own a dictionary?'

It takes a lot of education to make a ruling this stupid. It should be impeachable.