510
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 4 months ago

That sounds reasonable and still a massive upgrade for drivers.

[-] picoblaanket@lemmy.ml 35 points 4 months ago

If you wait 10 minutes for a fare… give a 20-minute ride to some suburban house… and then drive 20 minutes back to the city…

your pay would be $10.83 (with this new deal).

…that’s very different from $32.50 per hour.

  • Does an airline baggage-handler only get paid for the “specific minutes” when he is lifting luggage?

  • Does a cashier only get paid for “specific minutes” when there are customers in her line?

The original goal of this lawsuit was to classify drivers as employees under state law…

And that goal was ignored completely.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Does an airline baggage-handler only get paid for the “specific minutes” when he is lifting luggage?

What's actually tragic is similar things like this do happen in the air industry

Flight attendants for example are often paid only for hours on the plane. All the time getting to the planes through security screenings doesn't count. All the work they do at the gate before and after doesn't count. It's only hours in the plane.

[-] LordCrom@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Don't give them any ideas. If they could pay luggage people only during times lifting luggage they would. They just don't know how to yet

[-] bitchkat@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

But why wouldn't you try and pick up a fare before driving 20 minutes back to the city?

[-] Pacmanlives@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I mean in Denver going from the airport or across the city is 20-40 minutes airport can be an hour at times and I live in the city

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

I'm not arguing that this is a good deal or met whatever goal. I'm just saying it's an upgrade. Also, as a former uber driver, there are strategies to make the best use of your time. If this new wage applied to my location I would buy a car and make a killing. That said, I'm in the minority that prefers to run their own business rather than be an employee so if I have to be a wage slave again then no thanks.

[-] picoblaanket@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Okay...

Give me the math of how this new wage would help you “make a killing”.

Keep in mind that this wage merely sets a floor for the specific-minutes when you have a fare.

  • (And brother - driving for uber is not "running your own business"... it's being maximally-exploited by a business... with no liability-protection, no security, and almost zero rights.)
[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago

(And brother - driving for uber is not "running your own business"... it's being maximally-exploited by a business... with no liability-protection, no security, and almost zero rights.)

Both can be true! There's a reason I quit that shit years ago.

https://www.youtube.com/SolidDriver

[-] picoblaanket@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

I’m waiting for the math... Support your claim that you would “make a killing”.

I don’t see how you would...

The most you could possibly make would be $32.50 in an hour... (and that’s ONLY if you had a fare for ALL 60 minutes of an hour... and somehow still made less than $32.50 from those fares).

...And you'd be driving your own car and burning gas for that whole hour...

So show me (with math) how you’d be “making a killing”.

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 4 months ago

No. I'm not wasting any more time with you. Watch the videos if you want.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

What you're talking about is "waiting to be engaged" versus "engaged to wait."

The drivers are not on set schedules and have no obligation to the company except for the time between accepting a fare and dropping them off. If the drivers were required to return to a staging area and wait for a call the they'd need compensation. But they're not. They can do whatever they want at that point.

When I worked retail I wasn't paid for the time between my shift's end and the next one beginning, but that's what you're arguing for in this case.

[-] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 4 months ago

They can do whatever they want at that point.

What else do you imagine they're doing, though?

I mean, Uber has constructed a model where "waiting for your next fare" and "going home to your partner" look the same in a spreadsheet, and that then becomes the justification for not paying them. It's sleight of hand.

[-] picoblaanket@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The central feature of their business IS having drivers WAITING when a ride is requested.

So yes - it would be fair if they included some “waiting time” for each ride (maybe up to 15 minutes of actual waiting time).

These apps ONLY have value if there are drivers WAITING when a ride is requested, so drivers should be paid for that.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

My Dad used to be a hot-shot delivery driver.

He didn't sit around waiting for a job. He'd go about his business and when his phone pinged he'd decide in the moment if he wanted to do the job.

Sometimes we'd be watching TV and his phone would ping and he'd get up to leave. Sometimes he wasn't interested and he'd let someone else get it.

The issue with Uber, Lyft, etc isn't that they treat their drivers as contractors. People who have they option of when, where, and whether to work and are paid per task aren't employees. The problem is the pay is terrible for what they're doing.

this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
510 points (98.7% liked)

Work Reform

9966 readers
17 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS