190
submitted 1 year ago by favrion@lemmy.ml to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml

Ugh.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

That's a very valid point. Sometimes I question if very small instances (1-10 users) are not more detrimental than anything to the general performance

[-] r00ty@kbin.life 3 points 1 year ago

Whose fault is it though? If an instance is capable of 100 concurrent users but everyone flocks to the two or three big instances. What to do? Block instances so they shutdown? Then when the shit really hits the fan there's nowhere to distribute users to.

In the case of lemmy.world I might suggest they split the instance. Original lemmy.world keeps the communities but has no users. Create a new instance and transfer the users. That way the first instance is dedicated to federating the communities, moving the real time user database hits to a separate database. I'd also suggest preventing the creation of new communities on that instance.

In real terms it'd have been better if the communities were shared between instances more. Making a more even spread of the one to many distribution efforts.

[-] ruk_n_rul@monyet.cc -1 points 1 year ago

sounds like a cool idea. hit Ruud up once they're less busy.

this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
190 points (88.9% liked)

Fediverse

17535 readers
54 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS