science

14786 readers

7 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

m3t00@lemmy.world

Joleee@lemmy.world

laverabe@lemmy.world

DeadPand@midwest.social

434

Bill Gates-backed startup makes ‘butter’ out of water and carbon dioxide (www.zmescience.com)

submitted 4 months ago by disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world

213 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A California-based startup called Savor has figured out a unique way to make a butter alternative that doesn’t involve livestock, plants, or even displacing land. Their butter is produced from synthetic fat made using carbon dioxide and hydrogen, and the best part is —- it tastes just like regular butter.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 45 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Sounds like margarine with more chances to shit myself

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 89 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Margarine is made of hydrogenated oil. This is chemically identical to the fatty acids in butter. It’s not an alternative for dietary purposes, it’s just a more planet friendly solution.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 months ago

actual margarine is getting hard to find in stores around here, and when you do it's priced almost as high as a non-sale price of real butter. margarine has 80% fat content and similar baking and cooking properties as butter.

what's on store shelves is a cheapened, watered down product laced with extra chemicals and fillers, ranging from 25-40% oil and can't even make a proper box of mac & cheese. some of them don't even melt when put on toast, hot, right from the toaster.

[–] vegantomato@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

What about the trans fat byproduct from margarine production?

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I see you didn't read the article

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Basic internet etiquette. Never read the article. Disagree with everyone. You are always right. Everyone else is always wrong etc.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

You are absolutely wrong.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I think it's closer to the coal butter synthesis but maybe they found a more efficient method using other carbon sources

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margarine#Coal_butter

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fischer%E2%80%93Tropsch_process

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago

The process required at least 60 kilograms of coal per kilogram of synthetic butter.