this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
694 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3253 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ManosTheHandsOfFate@lemmy.world 79 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I remember a time when news for most people came from the local paper and/or a 30 minute network evening TV show. Both were written by real journalists who attempted to be unbiased.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 64 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Read up on roger Ailes and Reagan destroying 'The Fairness Doctrine.'

Back in the day, you could only own two radio stations in one town [AM and FM] and any editorial had to provide time for rebuttal.

[–] AttackBunny@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup. You can take nearly a modern “bad thing” and trace it back to Reagan policy.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nixon too. Particularly around the state of insurance in the US.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

And cancelling Apollo. The Saturn V was the greatest engineering achievement of the human race. If the Wright brothers had done their first flight and 8 years later some group flew a 747 across the Pacific ocean it would have been by multiple measures a less impressive achievement.

He cancelled the remaining missions and shelved the rocket. Within 2 years it could no longer be built and the country that went to the moon could not put a human into space. In the 50 years since then no rocket has come close to what it could do.

And he did it all for tax cuts.

[–] CynicRaven@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I think even that stuff could be said to be results of stuff like Aisles working with Nixon, and Justice Lewis Powell's memoranda. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_F._Powell_Jr.?wprov=sfla1

[–] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That is, until Sinclair and Clear Channel started gobbling up local affiliates to push their own narratives.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is extremely dangerous to our democracy

[–] jasondj@ttrpg.network 6 points 1 year ago

This Is Extremely Dangerous To Our Democracy
This Is Extremely Dangerous To Our Democracy