this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
594 points (91.2% liked)

Technology

59636 readers
2706 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Maybe they’re coming out with something new and more expensive, or they’ve entered a licensing deal with another -cast-able company so they can charge you or get licensing fees without the manufacturing overhead.

Or maybe they’re just being Google and cancelling yet another thing that people like to use.

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Its #1, its in the article. Has some forgettable name, haha

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

1 and a little of 2. New device and a new way to charge you.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They are, I saw an article for it the other day. Some compact set top box running Android TV that costs way more than any Chromecast ever did.

Casting is nice but I'm thinking now is a good time to consider switching to something like Apple TV if you need a dedicated streaming device since there's basically no price difference anymore.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago

I've had good luck with Roku so far, I know they're questionable but short of building a system to handle casting/streaming for me they seem to be the best bet right now