The format of these posts is simple: let's discuss a specific game or series!
Based on a recommendation I received, we'll change things up by actually not discussing a game or series like in earlier posts...
Let's discuss the 8-bit era of gaming. What is your favorite game of this generation? What aspects do you like about it? What doesn't work for you? Feel free to share any thoughts that come up, or react to other peoples comments. Let's get the conversation going!
If you have any recommendations for games or series for the next post(s), please feel free to DM me or add it in a comment here (no guarantees of course).
Previous entries: Animal Crossing, Age of Empires, Super Mario, Deus Ex, Stardew Valley, The Sims, Half-Life, Earthbound / Mother, Mass Effect, Metroid, Journey, Resident Evil, Polybius, Tetris, Telltale Games, Kirby, LEGO Games, DOOM, Ori, Metal Gear, Slay the Spire
I kind of feel a lot of 8 bit era games haven't aged the best. But there are a few that I love. Of course smb3 is really outstanding. That game is timeless and really showed how well Nintendo can make games. While I may personally prefer smw, smb3 was in my eyes the first to perfect the side scrolling platformer.
Mother is another game from the era I enjoy a lot. It hasnt aged as well as smb3, but it's still a fun game to look back on. I feel the game was a bit ahead of it's time, and with a few gameplay changes I think it would still be worth playing for any jrpg fan today
I've been watching Jeff Gerstmann work through and rank the NES library over the past year, and I agree with your sentiment. It seems like there are only like 10-20 NES games that actually hold up, and the rest of the library is either "good for the era" or absolute garbage.
I'd argue that is true of any generation, a few games are must plays and endure as such, then there are many that are just okay even at the time and then a bunch of crap it's hardly worth playing.
The "floor" for how bad a bad game can be has gone up as the generations have gone on. There's always a few stinkers, but most PS2 games are objectively better than like half of the NES library.
Better by which objective metric? Amount of content? Total size of game code and data? Got to disagree with you otherwise.
Like, half of the NES library is games riddled with bugs, or they are licensed games where the devs barely knew what they were doing so they just cranked out a piece of software that barely qualifies as a game. I'm not talking about the games that we remember. If you remember an NES game, even if you remember it as bad, I am 99% certain it isn't one of the dogshit games I'm thinking of. I'm not talking about like, Excitebike or Bubble Bobble or whatever. Those are classics, even if they've aged poorly. I'm talkin games like, Fester's Quest, or Mickey Mousecepade, or Jordan vs. Bird: One-on-One, or Time Lord. Games where just playing them feels bad.
But there are games that have the same problems today, they just look better because they have higher resolution assets but as still riddled with bugs and control issues.
I think the difference is that in the 8bit generation yhe majority of the game were bad relative to each other. The peak of the bell curve for 8bit was between mediocre to kinda bad games.
While there are more games in later generations, it feels like the console manufacturers took more control and regulated what was published. Bad games happen now because of shitty business decisions and bad story writing. You dont see garbage being published just because you can.
The only flaw of SMB3 to me would be that this game needed save games reeaal bad.
Lol that's fair! Been a while since I played it without save states