this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
1090 points (96.6% liked)
Atheism
1989 readers
1 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's more:
Even had the writers wanted to fact check the stories, they couldn't, they had spent too long in oral transmission.
Even the new testament wasn't written by the people who were there at the time, it was more like telling the stories that your grandfather heard from his grandfather
People are pretty prone to improving stories they tell, they make them flow better, they make people's motives clear when really they were hidden
Add to this tons of translations to different languages, not to mention different versions of the book in the same language. So it's a massive buffet where anybody can pick whatever suits their taste.
To put a finer point on it, your understanding of the author's understanding of the thing in this instance is a third Venn circle without much overlap to those first two. 🤌🏾
Also, many retellings of the thing in different languages with different understandings and intentions over many centuries.
"the thing" itself is (and should be) missing from the diagram.
I've also read The book of the damned by Charles Fort.