27

I was raised reform Jewish and am half Jewish by family history. I have ancestors who were victims of the pogroms in the Russian pale of settlement – specifically, all four of my great-grandparents on my father’s side, along with their parents (my great-great-grandparents). When they were children their families fled and eventually resettled in the USA.

There is another place that they could have gone instead: Palestine. At that time it was still part of the Ottoman Empire, and some of the displaced Jews of that time did elect to go to Palestine. As it happens, my ancestors chose the US, but they could have gone to Palestine if they’d wanted to.

The fashionable posture on the left to take towards Israeli Jews recently has basically been a combination of glibness and vitriolic hatred, often reaching the point of wishing death upon them (examples: 1 2). I don’t know… I just can’t really feel good about stuff like that. The fact that my family ended up in the US and not Palestine is really just a quirk of fate. I don’t think that my ancestors were, like, morally better people for choosing the US over Ottoman-era Palestine. (And given the recent uptick in “Turtle Island” discourse, it seems like a fair number of leftists believe my ancestors shouldn’t have been allowed to resettle in the US either.)

I think that Zionism (with the possible exception of cultural Zionism) has generally been a noxious idea throughout its history. I don’t think the state of Israel should continue to exist as it is currently constituted, and I think the near-ubiquitous racism among Israelis is shameful. But I also don't think that every Jewish person who moved to Palestine in the last 150 years was a bad person for doing that, and I’m not prepared to circle-jerk over the deaths of people that I have a fair amount in common with historically.

Am I missing something? Have I been hoodwinked by Zionist propaganda?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago

Bullshit. Retribution is not reactionary. Revenge is a moral good. Denying the oppressed revenged is siding with the oppressors.

[-] gay_king_prince_charles@hexbear.net 11 points 3 months ago

Revenge causes no change in material conditions and does nothing to help the oppressed in a meaningful way. It serves only as a means for the person enacting revenge to feel as if they helped, without actually helping.

[-] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I understand, the Nuremberg Trials were going too far. Those Nazis should have been rehabilitated or mercifully allowed to enjoy a retirement after murdering millions of people. /s

LIB

Hexbear needs a tagging feature like RES has so I can tag libs and know not to even bother reading your comments in the future because your brains are full of mush.

load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
27 points (90.9% liked)

askchapo

22745 readers
261 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS