politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Do any of these protestors honestly believe Palestineans will fare the same or better with trump in office?
Either they do and are thus too dumb to be worth listening to or they don't care about the people they profess to defend.
Edit: fixed a homonym.
No. They believe that Harris is more likely to be swayed than Trump is.
Exactly. Why don’t they protest at republican rallies? If anything, they are turning Democrats against them.
No they also know Trump is a lost cause or they would be protesting for Trump to change his stance.
If these protests are so harmful and your recognize genocide is bad and think Kamala agrees, then why isn't she giving in to their demands? She is the one throwing the election away, not people standing up against a genocide.
Why isn't she giving into their Demands you ask, I ask how? She can call for the Senate to vote on different funding/embargo deals. But this is delusional if we are now saying the Vice President can override the President and issue new while breaking old contracts signed by Congress to another country.
Thank you for framing this the way I think it.
It's not pro-Israel or pro-Hamas (to me). It's anti-genocide and anti our weapons being used for it.
That said, if we end up with Trump, then the purity test will have significant backlash.
"If you don't do what we say, you're the one throwing away the election!"
It's a pretty childish view.
"stop aiding a genocide or we won't vote for you" is actually a very adult view.
"No I'll keep defending the genocide even if it means losing" is the evil/childish view.
"Stop aiding a genocide or we'll allow the party that would speed up said genocide to win" is not an adult view.
Think about it a different way. Many Republicans feel any abortion is murder (so from their perspective, weare killing thousands of babies every month.) If they started protesting trump saying he'd better ban abortion or they'll allow Harris to win (despite the fact that she seems determined to protect the right to abortion) would that be an adult rational decision? Or would it be the same childish petulance?