[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I ow a how much?

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Appreciate the Pew link! I'd note thought that it talks about the general election, not primaries.

If the progressives don't outnumber the moderates and centrists even within the Democratic party, then that seems a pretty good indication that American politics is roughly in line with American attitudes, which would mean democracy is working as it should.

Here's the thing, Sanders got 43% of the primary vote iirc and Clinton got 55. This happened, despite the middle age and elderly voters showing up in significantly larger numbers than the young, presumably progressive ones. If the young voters had shown up and their vote patterns held, Sanders would likely have had a comfortable win.

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

What on Earth are you trying to say?

Harris and Biden were on the ballot in 2020, as were more progressive candidates. As usual, more moderates and centrists did the boring grown up work of showing up and voting in the primaries and thus, Biden won.

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

She was on the ballot in the primaries, which is entirely the point of the post.

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Yup. Young votes don't show up to the general or primaries at anywhere near the same rate as boomers. And sadly, democracy caters more to those who vote.

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Meh, I'd be pretty stunned if Bernie had won more votes and then the super delegates turned around and gave it to Clinton.

Given that we didn't get anywhere near that, it's a moot point. Let's get the majority of votes in a damn primary before we start complaining about what the super delegates might or might not do.

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago
545
[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Totally fair point about 2024. Though I would suggest that given Sanders' outspoken opposition to what's happening in Gaza, we might have a very different situation in the middle East had progressives voted in sufficient numbers in 2020. (Which in of itself would be a good thing but when I see complaints about Harris also being bad for Palestineans, this is my first thought.)

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Frankly, I've seen a lot of stupid "the Dems are evil too" nonsense here, I've seen a lot of complaints about the parties being the same and other nonsense.

The point of this meme and thread is to remind people that the choice between Harris and trump is entirely because the progressive wing doesn't show up to vote in the primaries while the moderates do. Some do vote but not enough. And frankly, if you break it down by demographic, it's the youth/young middle age that don't show up and get crushed by the elderly who vote.

BUT amidst all the complaints, I never see anyone say "damn, if only more of us had voted in the primaries." And if we had, we wouldn't be in this mess.

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

You're devolving into insane hypotheticals.

Fewer Palestineans die under a Harris term than a trump one and you are refusing to help.

That's the sum total. Have a happy Halloween.

705

Vote for the change you want to see.

The Republican party got remade because trumpists showed up and outvoted the party elites. No reason it can't happen for the Left except for laziness and apathy.

If all the progressives furious about the state of affairs now had shown up for Sanders in 2016, I doubt we'd be in this hellish timeline. Sadly, he needed the young progressive vote to show up.

44
submitted 3 days ago by Lauchs@lemmy.world to c/cat@lemmy.world

My elderly cat loves sitting on the computers, I think because they're warm. She's very obedient and leaves when asked but I'm wondering if anyone has had similar issues and found something appropriate and warm for them to snooze on?

-21
submitted 3 days ago by Lauchs@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Such an unforced error and at a moment when trump was playing defense. Are we surprised that the President calling people who vote trump garbage would be a bigger deal than one trash comedian amidst a dozen or so speakers?

We keep shooting ourselves in the foot and it breaks my heart.

877
909
123
submitted 1 week ago by Lauchs@lemmy.world to c/cat@lemmy.world

Just curious. If we're sharing the bed and I roll to not face her, my cat yells and marches over in front of whatever side I'm now facing and if there's not enough room, that's a problem for me to fix.

Just curious if this is standard cat behaviour or another adorably needy quirk of mine?

11
submitted 2 weeks ago by Lauchs@lemmy.world to c/movies@lemmy.world

Title pretty much says it all. When I watched the Sadness I learned, much to my surprise, that I sort of have limits where the gore becomes a bit too much.

That being said, that movie was on another level of impressively realistic horribleness happening for about two straight hours. Terrifier seems more Western and classic blood and stuff but wondered if anyone had seen both and had thoughts?

4
submitted 1 month ago by Lauchs@lemmy.world to c/music@lemmy.world

A helpful reminder for some!

383

Apologies if gifs aren't allowed!

28
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Lauchs@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

Almost everyone agrees there should be more compromises in politics. So I'm curious, how would that play out?

While I love the policy debates and the nuances, most people go for the big issues. So, according to the party platforms/my gut, here's what I'd put as the 3 for each party:

Democrats: Abortion rights, gun control, climate change.

Republicans: Immigration, culture war (say, critical race theory in schools or gender affirming care for minors) , trump gets to be president. (Sorry but it really seems like a cult of personality at this point.)

Anyway, here's the exercise: say the other side was willing to give up on all three of their issues but you had to give up on one of your side's. OR, you can have two of your side's but have to give up on the third.

Just curious to see how this plays out. (You are of course free to name other priorities you think better represent the parties but obviously if you write "making Joe Pesci day a national holiday" as a priority and give it up, that doesn't really count.)

Edit: The consensus seems to be a big no to compromise. Which, fair, I imagine those on the Right feel just as strongly about what they would call baby murdering and replacing American workers etc.

Just kind of sad to see it in action.

But thanks/congrats to those who did try and work through a compromise!

74
view more: next ›

Lauchs

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF