270
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] redballooon@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That’s true in the same way as you are nothing else but molecules and some biochemical reactions.

It’s reductionist, and otherwise not a useful description of a human, tells nothing about interaction possibilities, lifestyle or lifespan for example.

It’s also not an accurate description, because “molecules and biochemical reactions” describes very very many life forms, just as “a computer” could be your smartphone. But aside from both being a computer, a smartphone is quite distinct from a cloud.

[-] tym@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Have a listen to alan watts some time. We're all just molecular patterns.

The cloud is a series of clustered computer resources sitting behind load balancers, segmented by IP and DNS.

The cloud is very much someone else's computers, maintained by someone else's employees.

Source: a decade of big cloud consulting

[-] vynlwombat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Technically, clouds and "clouds" are also molecular patterns.

[-] mea_rah@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

For some definition of cloud. You also have on premises cloud. When Amazon runs their e-commerce site on AWS, are they running it on someone else's computer or not in cloud? (putting aside some tax-wise separation of individual Amazon subsidiaries)

On the other hand there are still providers that will rent you an server in their DC, but you don't get any API or anything else. At best they'll plug in HDDs that you sent them. This server hosting existed before "cloud" was a thing and it continues to exist.

I'd say that more accurate definition of cloud would be "someone else's computer with an API that customer can access". And if I'm really strict about that definition I'd drop entire first part, because it's the API that matters - computer might as well be yours.

Source: I've been on both sides of cloud from the very beginning.

[-] redballooon@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

again, while true that description is neither complete nor distinguished. It would get maybe 1 out of four possible points in a high school exam.

Not helpful for most things.

[-] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's reductionist, but it gets to the point that it's not an abstract everlasting resource, it's a system that's not under your control, so it might not be always reliable. So people should be wary of service discontinuations, rules and price changes.

The point can be distilled even further, the cloud is someone else's.

this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
270 points (98.6% liked)

Selfhosted

39937 readers
367 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS