87

The company has updated its FAQ page to say that private chats are no longer shielded from moderation.

Telegram has quietly removed language from its FAQ page that said private chats were protected from moderation requests. The change comes nearly two weeks after its CEO, Pavel Durov, was arrested in France for allegedly allowing “criminal activity to go on undeterred on the messaging app.”

Earlier today, Durov issued his first public statement since his arrest, promising to moderate content more on the platform, a noticeable change in tone after the company initially said he had “nothing to hide.”

“Telegram’s abrupt increase in user count to 950M caused growing pains that made it easier for criminals to abuse our platform,” he wrote in the statement shared on Thursday. “That’s why I made it my personal goal to ensure we significantly improve things in this regard. We’ve already started that process internally, and I will share more details on our progress with you very soon.”

Translation: Durov is completely compromised and will do whatever NATO tells him to do. Do not trust in the security of Telegram, which frankly was never that good to begin with. And do not trust anything else even remotely connected to the company or Durov personally.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 23 points 1 week ago

It will be interesting to see if anyone on the payroll at Signal is subjected to the same process.

[-] Chronicon@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago

The "hacker community" in the US which it springs from is so buddy buddy with the US security state that I don't think a public humiliation like this will be needed. I don't have any evidence signal is compromised, but I suspect they've at least picked an architecture that the security state is okay with. And it isn't used for mass media like telegram was, it doesn't scale like that.

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

I believe Signal received funding from the CIA’s VC firm. These apps need to be secure enough for dissidents and spies to use, but like you said, I imagine the state is content with its security or else they would be more heavy handed.

[-] Chronicon@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

yeah idk what to think. Tor too, its genuinely quite good as far as I can tell, but the background is a bit sus.

Matrix as well, although that's Mossad.

[-] Chronicon@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

if all the people chirping about how matrix is shit/compromised and I need to RETVRN to XMPP are right I'm gonna be so annoyed. I'm slowly starting to feel like they might be

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
87 points (95.8% liked)

technology

23174 readers
124 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS