218
submitted 1 month ago by some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/news@lemmy.world

New Mexico is seeking an injunction to permanently block Snap from practices allegedly harming kids. That includes a halt on advertising Snapchat as "more private" or "less permanent" due to the alleged "core design problem" and "inherent danger" of Snap's disappearing messages. The state's complaint noted that the FBI has said that "Snapchat is the preferred app by criminals because its design features provide a false sense of security to the victim that their photos will disappear and not be screenshotted."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I also find it to be repugnant, but if the images are not based on real people and the ai was not trained on real csam(good luck proving this either way), then it shouldn't be illegal. The laws were made to protect kids, and drawings of purly fictional characters are not hurting the kids.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Pretty much every law ever made in the history of humanity that was ostensibly to protect children is actually about control of the population.

This is just plain wrong.

Obviously, there are loads of laws and very good legislation that does indeed protect children.

Just one example: child labour laws.

I suspect that what you really mean is that whenever a politician says whatever police powers are required to protect children, they really just want more power to violate privacy to make it easier to prosecute various crimes.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Exception that proves the rule.

What about child support paid by parents who are separated?

What about welfare laws ensuring a minimum standard of care for children?

What about social security for families?

What about minimum age of consent?

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

What about this one particular gain of sand I found that's blue? Look, here's another and another. Clearly, all sand is blue and beaches are blue. Don't argue, or I'll show you the 6 grains of sand I found.

What a silly thing to say.

You've made an assertion, I've provided examples to the contrary, and the best you've got is a grain of sand metaphor?

Obviously, it depends how many laws purported to protect children actually do. The examples I've provided form the bedrock of the modern family structure. They're not insignificant grains of sand.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I'm not going to do a survey of every law in human history to satisfy your autistic contrarianism. I'm just gonna make fun of you.

You can make fun if me all you like. This far you're not doing very well.

You don't need to survey every law in human history, you just need to support your assertion, which you seem completely unable to do.

We all say silly things from time to time. Obviously you've just parroted something you heard somewhere else and didn't really think it through. Most people can just own their mistakes. Only idiots double down, and cowards start ranting about sand.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Or, I can recognize when it's not worth it to get involved with a sealion.

Imagine being so fragile you have to fool yourself that you're right about everything and all arguments to the contrary are bad faith. Pathetic.

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
218 points (98.7% liked)

News

23287 readers
3480 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS