Technology

37730 readers

319 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

Los@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

121

Misinformation: Baseless claim about U.S. presidential candidate Kamala Harris crash spread by mysterious website (www.bbc.com)

submitted 2 months ago by tardigrada@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A story posted on a mysterious website has been widely circulated on social media after it made a baseless claim that Kamala Harris - the Democratic presidential nominee - was involved in an alleged hit-and-run incident.

It claims, without providing evidence, that a 13-year-old girl was left paralysed by the crash, which it says took place in San Francisco in 2011.

The story, which was published on 2 September by a website purporting to be a media organisation called KBSF-San Francisco News, has been widely shared online. Some online posts by right-leaning users citing the story have been viewed millions of times.

BBC Verify has found numerous false details indicating it is fake and the website has now been taken down.

[...]

Fake news stories targeting the US

The story and the website it originally appeared on share striking similarities with a network of fake news websites that masquerade as US local news outlets, which BBC Verify has previously extensively reported on.

John Mark Dougan, a former Florida police officer who relocated to Moscow is one of the key figures behind the network.

Approached by BBC Verify to comment on the hit-and-run story, Mr Dougan denied any involvement, saying: “Do I ever admit to anything? Of course it’s not one of mine.”

The websites mix dozens of genuine news stories taken from real news outlets with what is essentially the real meat of the operation - totally fabricated stories that often include misinformation about Ukraine or target US audiences.

The websites are often set up shortly before the fake stories appear on them, and then go offline after they serve their purpose.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 months ago (13 children)

And now you, the mainstream media, are amplifying it and giving it oxygen.

It’s like y’all never learned the old Usenet adage: “don’t feed (quote) the trolls”.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 35 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Fact checking and clarifying fake news is not amplifying it, especially when it is already this widely spread.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Yes it is.

You might not wish it to be, but fact-checking absolutely does amplify fake news, especially if you give details.

A simple “this story is bullshit” is all that’s needed

[–] Xero@infosec.pub 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

No, fact checking is not amplifying it is correcting the narrative.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

It is, though. Studies in disinformation have proven this. This is why right-wing bullshitters are so eager to engage in debate: just getting the chance to show up and be refuted in a legitmate setting, like a major newspaper, gives them an audience for the ideas and credibility, that their position is one worthy of refute.

This is how we got the alt-right in 2015: by taking neo-Nazis seriously.

This is what the media doesn't understand, and why fact-checkers are getting--correctly--rolled on social media. Every time you bring up one of these lies, even to fact check it--especially to fact-check it--you give it credibility.

This is why the Harris/Walz campaign's tactic of ridicule is working so well. Instead of saying "No, you're wrong about XXX because YYYY and ZZZZ", they're saying "What is wrong with you? You're weird." The latter doesn't give the lie any oxygen.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 months ago

JD “couch fucker” Vance would beg to differ.

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)

load more comments (8 replies)