this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
1593 points (96.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

5731 readers
2021 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Did I say mandatory? I meant optional! You're "free" to die in a cardboard box under a freeway as a market capitalist scarecrow warning to the other ants so they keep showing up to make us more!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Goodie@lemmy.world 159 points 1 month ago (65 children)

I think a law stating you can't borrow against unrealized gains would be sensible.

You can keep your unrealized gains forever, live of your dividends for all i care, and pay no tax. But realizing them, either through selling or borrowing against, triggers a taxation.

[–] three20three@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Wouldn't that affect things like Home Equity loans?

[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Homes are taxed based on assessed value. They are already a form of taxing unrealized gains.

Most of the population either has:

  1. no unrealized gains
  2. gains in a retirement account that we can't borrow against
  3. gains in real estate that are taxed, but can be borrowed against
  4. a combo of 2 and 3

I think it's fair to ask that the rich play by the same rules. You can either borrow against your gains and pay taxes on them, or not pay taxes and not be able to borrow against them.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No because the mínimum for this to apply is 100 million.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The government also told the public that the income tax was going to apply only to rich people, how'd that turn out?

[–] Goodie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Depends on the exact implementation, but sure, you could happily write a version where an initial home loan isn't hit, and only "top up" loans against the INCREASED value of your home is targeted.

load more comments (61 replies)