1398
The back-to-office backfire: Companies ending WFH perks lose out on top talent, who view flexible work as equivalent to an 8% raise (www.businessinsider.com)
submitted 1 year ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
159 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/1125686

Archived version: https://archive.ph/vL1mC
Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20230806071111/https://www.businessinsider.com/employees-work-from-home-benefits-as-good-as-raise-2023-8

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Someonelol@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

A remote worker's worth is no less valuable than one who's onsite. If you want something like this to work then the employer should pay a differential for those who have to be onsite to compensate for the time and money spent commuting.

[-] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

So pay the WFF employee more than the WFH employee?

One way is baked in, the other is a topping, still damn near identical though

[-] Someonelol@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Instead of the stick of paying people less from working home, they're getting a carrot for deciding to be there. That has a wildly more positive perception for workers IMO.

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
1398 points (99.2% liked)

World News

32282 readers
753 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ml
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
jackmarxist@lemmy.ml
zephyreks@lemmy.ml
OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml