this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
997 points (93.9% liked)

Memes

45726 readers
812 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

I grew up in a rightwing household, and unquestioningly drank the koolaid until my late teens. The right's bullshit eventually became impossible to ignore, so I dove right into the 'both sides!' trap and rode the Libertarian train for a while.

It became really easy to articulate what I didn't like about the right; describing what was bad about the left was just echoes of Fox bitching about things like them voting on emotion instead of logic... but no real examples.

Around my mid-twenties I finally realized ^that was projection; then 2016 happened and holy shit they're running Trump and Hillary?? Easily the two most hated candidates in my lifetime... against Gary Johnson - an admittedly goofy personality but likeable and most importantly not crazy, THIS IS THE LP'S TIME TO SHINE! ....yeah they got 3% of the vote. We won't ever see better conditions for a 3rd victory, so, pipedream shattered.

Guess I'll have to just pick a lesser evil, so let's see what we have to work with...

  • there's the red team. Burn through our fossil resources with reckless abandon. War, war, war, and more war. Shave social services down to nothing so we can claim 'fiscal responsibility' which is good I guess (hey! eyes down here, we're done talking about the war part), a blatant integration of religion and politics, and they want to make life as miserable as possible for my gay/colored/female/nonchristian friends. Fuck, that's pretty bad...

  • Alright, next we have the blue team, which is the opposite of all those things, at the exceedingly high cost of... getting cockblocked by the red team when they try to implement those things... and... well there was that time Bill lied about getting a blowjob- outrageous! Surely the red team does a better job of keeping it in their pants... *checks* ...uhh, nope! Fuck, I'm starting to become aware of my own cognitive dissonance and it feels like absolute shit.

So I start voting one issue at a time, crunching both options against eachother and choosing the one that's best for the US. That way there's no bias and I won't be part of this tribal bullshit plagueing our politics.... Weird, when I ignore affiliation and vote on policy alone, my ballot becomes solid blue. What are the odds of that?! Next election, solid blue again. And again.

My desire to be 'independent' on label alone is pretty much gone at this point, and I'm being more and more vocal about supporting leftwing policies. Family isn't a fan, but they hit me with the shit OP is poking fun at - I only shifted blue because I'm poor! Once I make more money, just you wait and see, I'll come crawling right back.

Now, I'm not rich or anything, but I'm (finally!) not living paycheck to paycheck. During all ^that I wandered into the military which gave me access to all kinds of socialized resources which have enabled me to get where I'm at now and have made a pretty significant improvement on my life. The thing that pisses me off about those socialized services is WHY THE FUCK DOESN'T EVERYONE HAVE THIS?! So wearing camo for 4 years for some reason got me this VIP tour of what we should should be doing for everyone.

I was a late bloomer, I got there. I haven't missed a single election since 2016, big or small. Solid blue. I've gotten to the point where I'll even look up the voter registration of candidates for nonpolitical positions like judges, and red is a deal breaker.

The better off I become, the more blue I get. The notion of red-shift with income is trash.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Alright, next we have the blue team, which is the opposite of all those things, at the exceedingly high cost of... getting cockblocked by the red team when they try to implement those things... and... well there was that time Bill lied about getting a blowjob- outrageous! Surely the red team does a better job of keeping it in their pants... *checks* ...uhh, nope! Fuck, I'm starting to become aware of my own cognitive dissonance and it feels like absolute shit.

The DNC isn't to the opposite of the GOP, they are aligned on the vast majority of issues and use the rest to yap loudly in disagreement. Dems aren't left.

During all ^that I wandered into the military which gave me access to all kinds of socialized resources which have enabled me to get where I'm at now and have made a pretty significant improvement on my life.

Social programs aren't socialized, that's a bit of a misnomer.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

However US Corporations that exploit US Workers and Workers abroad are subsidized, even for their losses. Us Taxpayers pay them while they exploit us further and Social Services get gutted and crumble. Gotta love neoliberalism, where socialized welfare is bad for workers, but good for corporations.

Edit: not actual socialism like worker owned, just socialized losses, as in the working class paying taxes foot the bill for the corporations benefit and privatized gains

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Have you read Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism? It analyzes modern Imperialism, where workers in the Global North are both exploited by their bourgeoisie and yet benefit from the fruits of Imperialism, forming a labor aristocracy.

It isn't Socialism for corporations, it's Imperialism in action.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No, I have not. I've only touched on the book Consequences of Capitalism so far. Thanks for the req, I'll check it out.

Socialism isn't the right word, it's not like they are worker owned in any regard. It's just that the subsidies they receive for the benefit of their private business and profits for shareholders come from taxpayer money. Further redistributing weather to the wealthy at the expense of the working class Americans, and further enabling them to exploit us more. Their gains are privatized and their losses are socialized by the working class.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No problem! Lenin's writing is very eye-opening as it's Marxism applied to more modern, international Capitalism, but he may not make the most sense if you aren't already familiar with Marxism.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm somewhat familiar with the principals, but not enough to thoroughly explain them in a casual conversation.

It's definitely eye-opening to contextualize things like Nationalism, Fascism, Colonialism, and Imperialism within the Capitalist mode of production

Edited my comment to distinguish between genuine socialism and the welfare of corporations being socialized thru taxpayer money for their benefit and our expense.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

You may want to swing back to Principles of Communism as well as Socialism: Utopian and Scientific by Engels, then Wage Labor and Capital as well as Value, Price and Profit by Marx before getting into Lenin if you're not confident in the basics of Marxism. Lenin is Marxism applied to early 1900s Capitalism, which has largely grown along the lines he analyzed and predicted (among numerous other analysis in theory and practice).

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Thanks for sharing! I feel like this is representative of a small but important political group recently.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[–] index@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

there’s the red team. Burn through our fossil resources with reckless abandon. War, war, war, and more war.

The blue team is doing the same thing: burning through fossil resources in the name of war. The military complex doesn't stop or change when blue or red are elected.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_support_for_Israel_in_the_Israel%E2%80%93Hamas_war

I encourage you to keep studying and researching. Politics isn't a football match where teams compete against each others and "left" and "right" are two buzzwords.

https://archive.org/details/lawauthorityanar00kropuoft/page/n5/mode/2up

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I encourage you to keep studying and researching. Politics isn’t a football match where teams compete against each others and “left” and “right” are two buzzwords.

No offense but I think OP has a better grasp of this than you do

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So, what do you think is happening in Palestine? In Lebanon?

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You're acting like that's the only policy point that exists. There are meaningful differences in other areas. I don't have enough non-propagandized information to argue for sure that there are differences in the middle east war department, but the parties certainly aren't the same on all war-related matters (see Ukraine/Russia as an example). Their rhetoric is different for the middle east but again I can't speak for their actions. And obviously their non-war policies are drastically different.