Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5383 readers

187 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

silence7@slrpnk.net

189

As the waters rise, a two-year sentence for throwing soup. That’s the farcical reality of British justice (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 months ago by piefedderatedd@piefed.social to c/climate@slrpnk.net

71 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world -35 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Their lack of success is irrelevant. They tried to damage it.

I was already aware we're destroying the planet. I don't need stupid kids trying to destroy art in a museum to inform me about that.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They tried to damage it.

You say that like they were somehow shocked to find plexiglass in front of these paintings, and somehow didn't see it or didn't have the time (casually perusing a museum) to pivot to a different painting.

[+] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world -16 points 2 months ago (3 children)

You're assuming that they scouted this and carefully planned it to ensure they wouldn't cause damage. I doubt that.

This also assumes that the painting's protection is perfect. What if there is a flaw in the glass or a seam that lets the liquid get through somewhere? What if they accidentally threw the can while throwing the soup and it cracked something? Would you blame shift to the museum for not protecting their artwork from vandals properly? That would be ridiculous. I don't want to see every painting behind a glass case when I go to an art museum, either.

It's not worth the risk to such a artistic treasure just for attention seeking or 'awareness' of something totally unrelated. Last I checked Van Gogh wasn't part of the petroleum industry when he was alive. This kind of vandalism is stupid.

The should be doing shit like this to petroleum company offices.

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 22 points 2 months ago

The should be doing shit like this to petroleum company offices.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_Stop_Oil#Protests

They do. And those protests get little coverage and large prison sentences.

[–] spiffmeister@aussie.zone 18 points 2 months ago

You're assuming that they scouted this and carefully planned it to ensure they wouldn't cause damage. I doubt that.

Seems like they did:

The canvas of the painting is protected with a glass screen, a factor Just Stop Oil said they had taken into account.

[–] lostinfog@reddthat.com 3 points 2 months ago

Your fake outrage is too obvious