this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2025
19 points (91.3% liked)

UK Politics

3173 readers
194 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Do you think the press is too critical of Keir Starmer?

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  1. The press have it in for Labour
  2. How were the Tories getting on?
  3. Labour can't solve our economic problems without big upheaval. Are unwilling to accept that, even though public voted for change.
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)
  1. Labour are communicating their plan to the public really badly. All we hear is cut, cut, cut but nothing about what those cuts will enable them to do. There no positive narrative.
[–] primal_buddhist@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

This does also require the press to do the reporting but their remit seems to be only the bad bits.

[–] Tagger@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm disappointed in the lack of 'oven-ready' plans from them. They had a stable shadow cabinet for a good amount of time and I was confident they were going to sweep in and be quite dynamic, and I feel like I've yet to see that.

[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 3 points 11 hours ago

Yeah I agree. I understood them being deliberately vague during the campaign to reduce their attack surface but I thought they would come out swinging with loads of progressive bills after they won. I find the whole situation depressing tbh. Politicians have over-specialised in fighting elections to the point that they have don't have it in them to govern.

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The fact that one of their first major announcements was essentially 'We're taking heating money away from old people' might have been the stupidest thing they could have done.

Anyone with common sense knows that it's means tested now, and those that need it should be able to get it, but, Christ, they screwed it up. Even if they'd waited until the spring, and gave guides on how to apply, they would have looked more compassionate, and not so clueless.

[–] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

"They screwed it up". They don't have a friendly and receptive media they can call on to spin their message.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

Hey that's not true at all, the whole world has seen those atrocious AI ads about how they're putting more cops on the street!

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most of the British press is openly anti Labour. Expecting anything else is just delusional.

[–] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

I'm sure Laura fucken Kuenssberg will treat Labour in a fair and balanced manner /s

[–] lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He is a shit lib and has done nothing for the working class. He's just another Biden, precisely what the plutonomy requires.

[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Corbyn had more left-wing positions, but he lost two elections, so I think Starmer realised that a more centrist position would give Labour a better chance of becoming the government.

I guess I'm just saying that it could be worse. If Sunak had won the 2024 election then the country would probably have experienced more managed decline.

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 15 points 1 day ago

He's just paving the way for an even more rabid right wing government at the next general election.

[–] YungOnions@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be honest, yes I do. It's been less than a year and already Labour has 'failed'. At least give them time. I'm not saying they're going to fix everything, but they'll be a damn sight better than the Tories.

[–] Tagger@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Oh for sure, at least I feel like this lot are getting to make things better for most people.

My worry is that if they're not good enough ukip will sneak their way in.

[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Starmer and the rest of Labour besides a few good eggs deserve no respect.

Obviously this doesn't mean the press don't have a distorted way of presenting Labour relative to how they presented the Tory govs failings.

I'd rather the British public lose all hope in a future with any of the current political offerings than hold out hope for a neoliberal Labour party that are out of their depth. The sooner the farce and sham bourgeois democracy is realised for what it is by the masses the better. No more managed decline.

[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Daily Mail is a rag what else is new? If Starmer had any good economic policies (he is the Prime Minister, not a candidate), the public would like him regardless of what right wing "press" says.