this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
217 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

60486 readers
6094 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 3 points 1 hour ago

It weirds me out that I can easily see a post is in lemmy.world by the comments

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I see ZERO discussion about how this is obvious theatre. We are so incapable of standing up to basic manipulation tactics from the right.

trump first started using tiktok as another xenophobic boogeyman, in what was a fairly nuanced situation - trump's position being completely wrong, but ultimately some truth to the fact that companies run in China inherently have involvement of the Chinese government and thule should be reached, monitored and if abused, access should be removed.

This actual push was always meant to be something to hang on Biden admin either way (because again, some valid points to a potential ban) but in reality trump will now "save" this artificial shutdown to "restore tiktok" and millions of low information voters and non voters alike will think he did something. And in the meantime, whatever the fuck this lemon8 and red whatever apps are will likely be a huge privacy monitoring home as midst will leave things dormant in background as well after tiktok is "restored".

Again, we are just so I'll equipped for anything to do with technology.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 43 minutes ago* (last edited 35 minutes ago) (1 children)

I agree with you.

And, well, I assume everything coming from the US is ~~theater~~ entertainment from the get-go. That's why I don't even bother discussing it anymore although I have recently pointed that out about Trump is trying to divert with the Greenland fiasco and the media is being complicit. This is just another one of the pile. I think he's purposely flooding the media and pushing for Americans' mental exhaustion.

ultimately some truth to the fact that companies run in China inherently have involvement of the Chinese government

I'd say that's an understatement. The Chinese government is greatly involved in many aspects of their social media because they don't have speech protections for individuals nor the press. Xi wants absolute control, so the Chinese government is also involved in other questionable news this week about sponsoring hackers who were primarily targeting the US for gathering intelligence: Millions of Americans caught up in Chinese hacking plot - US. They had state-sponsored malware on 10,000 computers targeting civil rights activists. It doesn't seem in their interest to play fair, I wonder what their strategy would be if Trump steps in to stroke hes ego.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 37 minutes ago* (last edited 31 minutes ago)

Also, part of me thinks one of his aides overheard someone talking about banning TikTok for this reason and thought to himself, "Sounds good but it's too leftist for us to peddle. This would be great to pin on the old geezer!." and pitched it to Trump as a win-win. It's absurd, don't listen to me.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

There will just be a new (US based) TikTok copycat that springs up, or many. Banning one social media cancer doesn't stop the others

[–] rob200@endlesstalk.org 1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

“They” say they are banning it over national security concerns I think it’s deeper then that. They can’t have a socialist like platform having an audience. Which in my opinion is why they wanted to force a sell or just ban Tiktok.

I don’t think, that they will go after Rednote if it doesn’t gain popularity the way that Tiktok did.

[–] B312@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t really say TikTok is socialist like, but yeah it’s clear it was only banned because they don’t like it and not its harms

[–] rob200@endlesstalk.org -3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Maybe not TIktok itself, I was mainly referring that it's maintained by a Chinese company. Too many people in the u.s think China is communist, but it's lately more like socialism.

But whether it's socialism, or communism, the Republican party most outspokenly, won't have either one of those. Mainly because it can devalues the capitalists.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

China is socialist like 1940 Germany was socialist.

can't really explain those camps away, can they...

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago

Ok.

(I bet tiktok doesn’t shut down, but if it does I can’t wait for my kids to tell me about all the meltdowns at middle school over tiktok shutting down. Too many parents let their kids have unfettered internet access. No, mine don’t have tiktok.)

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

Cool.

Cool cool cool.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 17 points 7 hours ago
[–] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf -1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

A lot of people are saying that the US government banned TikTok, but from what I'm understanding, that's not really what happened and what's happening. Or have I misinterpreted things? From what I understand, they were told they had to divest and sell, but they fought that and now are opting to shutdown rather than comply. Is that not the case?

Either way, I'm gonna go all "I walked to school uphill both ways barefoot in a meter of snow" on this and say that my very little experience with TikTok users seems to suggest that its not much more than pure, unadulterated brain rot. So regardless of the fact(s) (i.e. shutdown / banned / etc), there's maybe the tiniest sliver of a net positive here. Or not. It doesn't affect me one way or the other and given where this country is politically (as well as where it is headed), I don't give a rat poopoo.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

brain rot

It's a superior algorithm. You get what you engage with.

I'm going to miss the largest community of left leaning American creators, educators, and activists. I've learned so much about politics, social engagement, and community building.

But that's just my feed. I'm sure there's a lot of crap too.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world -2 points 1 hour ago

how dare you bring an enlightened perspective into the Chinese brain rot on this platform! /s

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 98 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

Any social media that you isn't open and self hostable (Lemmy, Mastodon, etc) should not be used. That includes Facebook, Instagram, Twitter/X, TikTok, and more.

Most social media has, IMHO, been a net-negative for society and I am in the generation that grew up with it in its infancy.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 26 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

My one wish for Fediverse would be federated identities. So I don't have to have baronvonj@ for ever single one of them.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago

On the plus side, it's nice that you don't need a new ID for every Lemmy instance.

[–] abeorch@friendica.ginestes.es 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

@baronvonj
What do you mean? I'm posting from a #Friendica account to #mastodon, #lemmy and #pixelfed - One account. no worries
@chronicledmonocle @technology

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

You can use mastodon from Lemmy? I don't have it so I don't know how that works.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Lemmy sits a bit apart from the rest in that it doesn't quite work for direct person-to-person interaction. Following Lemmy discussions on Mastodon is possible but clunky and Lemmy doesn't quite know how to quiet all the @ mentions and things in comments made from Mastodon so they look really loud/busy. I can see Lemmy communities from Firefish but I don't see any of the posts/comments (maybe I have to follow one first?). I've never tried following Lemmy from Pixelfed.

But each of those platforms has a different UI. The experience and features posting media on Pixelfed is much different. But I still have to setup a separate Pixelfed instance account if I want to make use of them. And my data will thus be spread across those instances. And people will need to follow both the Mastodon and Pixelfed accounts if they want to see both sets of posts. I'd love to just hat the one identity to manage with my content from all platforms associated with it.

[–] abeorch@friendica.ginestes.es 1 points 6 hours ago

@baronvonj
Use #Friendica - #lemmy works well there for me - you also got to realise there is a lot of playing around with UIs in different client apps - #Fedilab #racoon plus so many more
@technology

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 11 points 10 hours ago

I second this opinion. The federated applications and communities aren't perfect, but it's less toxic and better to use in general due to the lack of an all-encompassing algorithm that guides your usage to increase views for ad revenue.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 21 points 9 hours ago

Stop. Don't. Come back.

[–] NastyNative@mander.xyz 18 points 9 hours ago

Fantastic cant wait!

[–] DocumentingReality@lemmy.cafe 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If you have $50 Billion, you can buy Tiktok.

I read that Elon Musk might buy it. But the CEO of Tiktok stated that, it isn't true.

Why would he even need another social media? Besides, dictating what he wants on that site...and make it worse?

I like when Jack Dorsey ran Twitter. It is a crap hole now on there.

As for Tiktok, it won't matter to me since I am not on there.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 6 points 6 hours ago

you can buy TikTok

Not if they're not selling

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 17 points 10 hours ago

Just fucking get it over with already! I'm tired of hearing about this shit every single day.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 26 points 11 hours ago (9 children)

Reminder: TikTok is not actually important. Everyone can live their lives without TikTok, YouTube, etc. There's an infinite amount of ways to entertain ourselves and there's a lot of competing apps.

This isn't the government abusing its power to shut down some small business/upstart. It's shutting down a serious national security threat and a monopoly. TikTok has abused their position many times in many ways, refused to cooperate, and has reached the, "find out" phase.

[–] xnx@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 hour ago

This is absurd. Facebook was literally used to sow division and help elect a fascist who constantly says he wants to rule for life and wants to imprison his enemies. Facebook and instagram is wayyyyy more of a national security threat.

A congressman explicitly stated tiktok videos are swaying the opinion of people against israel and america’s genocide in palestine and now its being shut down. This is an abuse of power and its laughable you dont care because “china bad”

If its not censorship because theres alternative ways to communicate than nothing is censorship other than being killed

[–] ianonavy@lemmy.world 17 points 6 hours ago

I don’t entirely agree. TikTok isn’t just silly dances, thirst traps, and trends—it has played a significant role in community organizing and coalition-building across social movements. Consider the university Pro-Palestine encampments or mainstream news reporting on social media reaction to the United Healthcare CEO’s killing. Neither is solely attributable to TikTok, but the scale and nature of discussion on the platform have demonstrably influenced real-world conversation and activism. Another example is Keith Lee’s viral restaurant reviews transforming the viability of small mom and pop businesses overnight.

What sets TikTok apart isn’t just its massive reach (150 million monthly active users, nearly half the US population) but also its algorithm and features that enable collaborative, asynchronous discussion. Unlike YouTube Shorts or Instagram Reels, where content is mostly one-off entertainment with fleeting comment sections, TikTok fosters actual conversations. Features like stitching allow users to directly respond to others, creating an evolving discourse where users can trace context. At times, entire feeds become dominated by discussion of a single topic—sometimes celebrity gossip, but often major events like October 7 or the United Healthcare CEO killing. This level of organic, large-scale discourse doesn’t happen the same way on other platforms. A great example of this dynamic was when TikTok users collectively decided to migrate to the actually Chinese app XiaoHongShu specifically to spite the US government. That didn’t just happen—it was discussed and coordinated.

In my view, TikTok is a national security threat not because of unproven claims about data leaks or state-authored propaganda, but because it provides an already restless and dissatisfied population with a real platform to discuss issues and organize. If a decentralized, open-source alternative existed at scale, TikTok itself wouldn’t be necessary. I acknowledge that TikTok—like any centralized platform—has real issues, particularly around privacy and censorship. But until such a decentralized alternative gains traction, TikTok remains important. And even then, I doubt the US government would be any more comfortable with a decentralized version, since it still wouldn’t give them control over what discussions take place.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 25 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

There is a false dichotomy on Lemmy, that the government should shut down Meta due to security threats too because of this. They can both be bad.

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 24 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, they should shut down both. Honestly, X should be on the chopping block even faster that Meta, but Zuck seems committed to racing Musk to the bottom.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 4 points 7 hours ago

Everyone can live their lives without TikTok, YouTube...

I was an adult before YT and I don't want to go back to a time before it existed. It's just too damn useful as a self education tool. Need to learn how to DIY a plumbing problem? Youtube. Need to learn how to subnet a network? Youtube. Interested in the History of Moldova? Youtube.

I finished my basement by watching youtube videos and learning how to do everything from framing to electrical to drywall to finishing work. There isn't anywhere else you can freely get the same breadth of knowledge on-demand.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 14 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Reminder: there’s an ongoing trade war between US and China and this is likely just a part of it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 hours ago

Instagram reels about to get a whole lot worse

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 21 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That would go beyond the ban’s requirement for app stores to stop offering downloads of the app, but not immediately halt use of it.

Before the tankies get mad about the "censorship" of the US while failing to mention the LONG list of things you can get straight up arrested for in China

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 13 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Or have a "tea drinking" session:

When I was able to speak to Ms. Wu about the "tea drinking" session (euphemism for police harassment), she sharply conveyed her sense of vulnerability due to the lack of interest in her stepping away from her popular Twitter account, stating,

Literally the only thing that was keeping me online for the past few years was they were worried it would make China look bad if they cracked down on me. Now that they know that I could be dead in a ditch tomorrow and no one would give a shit or say a word I’m 1000x less safe here.

[...]

Wu added,

After years of doing this without anyone saying anything, on June 30th, out of the blue, they send plainclothes thugs to my house. Surprise! They were real cops.

Why? because she's LGBTQ+, has a Uyghur partner, and has some friends in Western nations.

reference: https://www.hackingbutlegal.com/p/naomi-wu-and-the-silence-that-speaks-volumes

https://x.com/RealSexyCyborg/status/1177145458503737344

load more comments
view more: next ›