this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
138 points (91.1% liked)

Science Memes

11597 readers
950 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Reference (passed peer review btw):

Muhammad Salman Hameed, Hongxuan Cao, Li Guo, Lei Zeng, Yanliang Ren, Advancements, challenges, and future frontiers in covalent inhibitors and covalent drugs: A review, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry Reports, Volume 12, 2024, 100217, ISSN 2772-4174, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmcr.2024.100217.

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 13 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

What's up with this AI generated garbage? This post isn't even half a day old and the article is already down.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's still up, just remove trailing dot from DOI

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Ahh, a typo! Thank you! I wish it was down tho

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Its still there but the links goed trough like 3 proxys and sometimes fails.

Also new theory: auto generate ai slop on official platforms like science research to auto share those on social media as rage bait to then auto sell the “active” account in the furure.

It doesn’t need to be economically feasibly to be sure some people are trying something like it.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 points 5 hours ago

True true, AI slop sucks

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

"I have lung cancer? How bad is it?"
"Well let's just say it's...non-small lung cancer."

I just want to see the tiny cars

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Actually that part is a legitimate classification and not part of the AI nonsense. Broadly, lung cancers are classified as either "small cell" cancers or "non small cell" cancers based on how the tumor appears microscopically. The "non small cell" cancers can be further subdivided into various types.

The reason for this distinction between the two is due to the significant difference in clinical management and prognosis. Having "small cell" lung cancer is effectively a death sentence, whereas the other types are a lot more treatable.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 4 points 7 hours ago

They're living up to the chinese stereotype unfortunately

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It's not little, it's normal-sized in a world where SUVs have become the norm.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 2 points 5 hours ago

Exactly. It's non-small!

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 19 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if they tested this on ridiculously well-endowed rats.

[–] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 4 points 11 hours ago

If they did it would be nuts.

[–] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Turn around, bright eyes.

EGFR and AFATINIB

And I need you now tonight.

And I need you more than ever.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago

Afatinib is real though

[–] friendlychemist@infosec.pub 73 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

That image was generated by AI and edited over. They didn't even bother correcting all of it or erasing the parts that didn't make sense.

Ffs, this is blatant.

[–] Morphit@feddit.uk 14 points 15 hours ago

edited over

What did they edit?

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

How in the fuck did this pass peer review?

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

what peer review? This is likely one of the many reviewless journals that solely exist to publish, for a generous fee, shit that wouldn't even pass as an undergrad homework. people then can write in their CVs for grant applications or position applications in low tier universities etc The name of the journal is usually chosen to look fancy and very international so it looks good on your CV. Honestly there are so many such journals now, no one person would be able to tell which is which, it's a complete mess. Humans find a way of fucking up everything for profit.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 2 points 7 hours ago
[–] neurospice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 hours ago

I'm wondering if the editors are actually just ChatGPT

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 25 points 18 hours ago

Not even peer review, the problem doesn't go far enough to reach the level of checking the scientific methodology. Did nobody even read the article before publishing? They don't have editors in the journal this was published in?

[–] Laser@feddit.org 54 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Dang, is always the small cars.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago

Maybe c/FuckCars is on to something.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 24 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The only way to fight small cars is with COVEEENT INHIBTORS

[–] Morphit@feddit.uk 7 points 15 hours ago

Despite the constant negative press covfefe

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

Small cars are fine, it's the non-small ones that are cancerous

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 20 hours ago

Non-small lung cancer: 🚙

Seems legit.

[–] ilovededyoupiggy@sh.itjust.works 19 points 18 hours ago

Everything reminds me of HER2.

[–] Mitsu@pawb.social 8 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

NOOO GO AWAY, BIND/TORTURE/KILL KILLER DO NOT GIVE ME CANCER

[–] AlbertSpangler@lemmings.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Doi seems to be a dead link now?

[–] Morphit@feddit.uk 3 points 15 hours ago

I can still see it.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 20 hours ago

text looks sus too