this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
94 points (91.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

30203 readers
1679 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brlemworld@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

What about ants? Aren't there like 3 trillion septillion or something?

[–] JDTIV@lemmy.world -2 points 10 hours ago

Might be an unpopular opinion but I don't think we are an invasive species. We naturally shifted and took over.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Haven't seen The Matrix, huh?

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] thenextguy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

His speech about humans being the only life that simply expands until all resources are used up is not at all true. Most living things do this until or unless they have some kind of predator or competitor to keep them in check.

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Well a lion doesn't have a predator (besides us) and doesn't kill for pleasure then waste a whole antelope

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 6 hours ago

Lions tend to be bad enough at hunting that that is their population control lever.

[–] thenextguy@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Sure. I said most living things. Not all.

[–] ahornsirup@feddit.org 3 points 13 hours ago

Lions might not, but housecats do. Bears are also known to be very wasteful with the salmon they catch.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] thenextguy@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

I feel saturated...by it.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Humans are so invasive that they have gone to places that can’t even support human life for prolonged periods of time. Deep sea trenches, tall mountains, polar ice caps etc. Even the Moon isn’t safe from humans, and now they are also planning to invade Mars. Once they’ve spread all over every planet, moon and asteroid in the solar system, they’ll probably try to land on the Sun.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

They'll collapse their own civilization well before all that becomes possible. Personally, just the idea of Mars colonization strikes me as just cringingly deluded. Forget the hard limits imposed by relativity, even to get something as tiny as a satellite into space requires the full stack of today's civilization to be up and running - i.e. everything from the food and energy system required to keep 8 billion people alive to the advanced microchip factories. All of this depends on a climate that humans are currently turning upside down and on an ecological substrate (soils, oceans, freshwater, biodiversity) that we're pounding into oblivion. To anyone who can see in front of them, some kind of collapse is literally inevitable. Forget Mars colonies, we'll be lucky if we're eating. A few decades at most.

PS: This comes across as a bit depressing but I don't mean to spread hopelessness. Personally I'm not a cynic or even really a pessimist. After all, there's always some way that we can make things better than they might otherwise be. It's important to be realistic but nothing about the future is inevitable.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 3 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, you’re right. None of these absurd journeys can take place if the rest of the population struggles to survive. My guess is, wrecking the whole planet beyond repair is the only thing that will force governments to start banning fossil fuels and investing in carbon capture and storage technologies.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Username does not check out.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Ha. Dumbest name ever but too late to change now.

[–] friendlychemist@infosec.pub 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And the most destructive. Seriously, I hope enough of us can get a grip and make world governments get their shit together.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 8 points 1 day ago

Algae literally caused the extinction of nearly all life on Earth at one point, we’re still not at that level yet, give it a few more decades of unchecked global warming though.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that mean that we would have had to be transported by some other species into environments where we previously weren't? We didn't "hitch a ride" on anything else; we went on our own.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Interesting point and actually quite hard to refute!

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We're even invasive to ourselves.

[–] thenextguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Go invade yourself.

[–] Etienne_Dahu@jlai.lu 1 points 1 day ago

You don't know reynoutria japonica.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Let's look at humanity as natures' invention that could protect the Earth against total destruction of life from huge meteorites : in this context, our actual partial destruction of the biosphere (and of 99.99%? of our civilisations) is not so important.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's an original take. But it feels a bit forced. We're already halfway thru Earth's allotted quota of 9 billion years of habitability. Life has been here most of that time so it seems odd that nature would suddenly think up such an extreme version of life insurance. Not least because humans look likely to do a better destructive job than at least a couple of the previous mass extinctions.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

We don't know yet if humanity will succeed. And you are absolutely right : my proposition here is quite forced and incomplete. Yet, if we consider a broader perspective : on many planets, similar to the Earth, there must be somewhere, at some moment, a sentient species succeeding in something like this.