this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
247 points (93.0% liked)

Nintendo

18706 readers
350 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

  1. No NSFW content.
  2. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  3. No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
  4. No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
  5. No console wars or PC elitism.
  6. Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
  7. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here
  8. Links to Twitter, X, or any alternative version such as Nitter, Xitter, Xcancel, etc. are no longer allowed. This includes any "connected-but-separate" web services such as pbs. twimg. com. The only exception will be screenshots in the event that the news cannot be sourced elsewhere.

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date


|


Donkey Kong Country Returns HD | Jan 16, 2025 Xenoblade Chronicles X: Definitive Edition | Mar 20, 2025 Metroid Prime 4 | 2025

Other Gaming Communities


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Switch 2 reveal on Thursday didn't tell us much, but the one thing Nintendo was quite particular about showing was the suite of I/O options on the console. I'm pleased to see we're getting an extra USB-C port, but nothing could compare with the joy of seeing a real, proper headphone jack highlighted so prominently in a 2025 hardware reveal.

Headphone jacks still prominently feature in many of the best gaming handhelds, including modern devices like the Steam Deck OLED, as well as standard PS5 and Xbox Series controllers. But ever since 2016, when Apple declared its own "courage to move on" from analog audio output in favor of Bluetooth, I've been increasingly nervous that other tech companies would start to crawl in the same direction.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hafty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Until for whatever reason Nintendo decides to sell bluetooth headphones, I don’t think we’re losing the headphone jack.

[–] dunidane@lemmy.sdf.org 74 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Given how Bluetooth works on the switch 1 it might also just be they couldn't be bothered to make it good.

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 17 points 3 days ago

Good enough reason

[–] Grangle1@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I used to walk to all sorts of places when I needed things, or even just for fun, while listening to music or podcasts, when my phone had a headphone jack. Now I never walk anywhere and just about never listen to music on my phone because I can't keep the wireless earbuds connected to the phone or to each other and they're always only at 50-60 percent charge if I'm lucky. Removing the headphone jack from my phone has literally made me less healthy. Thanks, Apple.

[–] invertedspear@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

If it improves your life and health, buy a headphone dongle. You shouldn’t need to, and it’s fair to complain about spending another $20, but invest in your health before it’s too late.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 2 days ago

Nah, I'd prefer to just go without. After all, what's the worst that could happen? I dro

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I have a pair of 3 year old Sony ones and they have never died or lost connection. The wired connection was great and I like that its there but these issues aren't realistic, especially given they charge through the same unit as your phone most often.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

nintendo is incredibly pragmatic... is it because of battery life?

[–] cmrss2@aussie.zone 56 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I think that is one of the reasons, but the main one is probably interference from controllers.

When they added Bluetooth audio to the original switch, they had a limit on the number of controllers you could have connected at the same time (I think it was like two?). So it’s probably the same for switch 2, they just don’t want to deal with it

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

latency can be a problem, too

doesn’t matter much for calls and music, but timing of gameplay can be harmed with audio lag

[–] xep@fedia.io 14 points 3 days ago

This was immediately obvious to me once I tried playing a rhythm game with bluetooth headphones. Never again.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Definitely matters for calls, most wireless headphones lower quality for decreased latency when the microphone is on.

At least that’s my understanding

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No, that's because the Bluetooth spec (or codecs, or something) only allow for lower-bandwidth audio in order to support bidirectional streams.

Like if you've got a limited bandwidth, you can run any two of high quality audio, stereo audio, and microphone input. There's not enough for all three.

That's simplified and probably not 100% accurate, but you get the idea. (Latency probably figures in there too, but it's not the primary reason, as far as I know.)

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

Makes sense, thank you

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

High latency (multiple seconds) can be a problem for carrying on conversations (calls), but even very small latency (fractions of a second) can be the difference between catching a fish and missing it in ACNH (for example).

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

True, but I'm not sure how common the use case of having a bunch of controllers connected and Bluetooth audio is. Or even more than one player and wired headphones. I'd imagine almost everyone doing multiplayer is doing it on a TV over HDMI.

Even if it's one player with multiple controllers somehow (two detached joycons, for example), it's unlikely a game would need very many.

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I'm guessing at least partly their audience. I haven't kept up with every release, but it seems like Nintendo has always tried to keep their consoles cheaper than the others. And they're popular with families with kids. Kids lose headphones, be they wired or wireless, and replacing a $5 pair of earbuds is way cheaper than wireless ones.

[–] icecreamtaco@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

All that hassle to save one square cm of internal phone mass. I guess we'd be thanking them if it ended up being a good idea like killing Flash or disc drives but still, lmao

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 2 days ago

Lack of head phone on my most used device creates a daily friction that reminds how I am just I hate parasites at these companies making decisions nobody asked for.

[–] Noit@lemm.ee 0 points 3 days ago

Is Nintendo the only console producer whose consoles get used for mega LAN events? I was at a regional Pokemon event the other day where there were 500+ people playing Switch within a few tens of metres of each other. Aside from the fact that wireless gear could enable cheating, the wireless interference would be a real issue.