this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
24 points (92.9% liked)

196

1310 readers
3347 users here now

This community only has one rule.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

founded 1 day ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 21 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This person has found an actual solution:

https://mlzeng.com/an-interesting-equation.html

x = 36875131794129999827197811565225474825492979968971970996283137471637224634055579

y = 154476802108746166441951315019919837485664325669565431700026634898253202035277999

z = 4373612677928697257861252602371390152816537558161613618621437993378423467772036

This is apparently the smallest solution.

The derivation of the solution itself requires an understanding of Diophantine equations and elliptical curves, which I will not pretend to understand well enough to summarize.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

From the same article, this is a solution when negative integers are allowed:

{{x -> 11, y -> 9, z -> -5}}

[–] big_fat_fluffy@leminal.space 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Is it the intersection of 3 curves?

Am I being trolled?

[–] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

🍎=376556443707

🍌=50000000000

🍍=50000000000

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Now do it for a case where a,b, and c are pair wise not equal.

[–] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 12 points 16 hours ago

I have to admit, my solution is not correct anyways. I simple found a "solution" for which the margin of error is smaller than the calculator's level of precision.

Sorry everyone, I cheated.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

1, 1 and 7. The sum is 3.75 – take it or leave it.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Good enough for engineers.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 12 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Electronic engineers will know that 1, 1, 8 is closer but will go for 1, 1, 6.8 because they are in the E6 series and that will save 0.1 cents per device.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

1, 1, 6.8

"6.8 isn't an integer"

"It rounds to an integer"

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 4 points 19 hours ago

"The tolerance is 5% so an integer is in range"

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

no, no I can't

[–] De_Narm@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The solutions don't quite fancy me as positive whole values, see for yourself.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 2 points 22 hours ago

An integer solution does exist.

[–] sunshine@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Not the same problem.

The original solution to this one was posted by +johncbaez999 on Google Plus and reposted here.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

Ew please don't link Reddit without warning.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)