this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
220 points (98.2% liked)

Slop.

317 readers
551 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

not even radlib "but Tiannemen square" they're straight up FBI posting lmfao

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TeethOrCoat@hexbear.net 41 points 1 day ago

How do you claim to be on "the left" and have worse politics than normie folks on XHS?

[–] AntifaSuperWombat@hexbear.net 42 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Wasn’t r/antiwork supposed to be the least bad one of all these wannabe labour subs when the whole moderator fiasco happened? And now they’re straight-up calling Xiaohongshu a far-right source. bruh-moment

[–] Future_Honkey@hexbear.net 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The fiasco was the hard-end-full-stop-crib-death of antiwork's nascent class-consciousness. If it was ever something (and it felt like it was) It hasn't been anything since.

[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That sort of thing is why I'm a Marxist-Leninist. I can't help but think it could've been avoided if the sub staff were practicing democratic centralism and beholden to decisions like "no, don't half-ass an interview with hostile corporate media."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Chapo_is_Red@hexbear.net 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Very nationalistic sounding. I didn't think reddit was so obviously for a particular nation.

[–] SuperZutsuki@hexbear.net 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

slaps the top of reddit

"This baby can fit sooo many CIA operatives in it!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unlike reddit which is not owned by capitalists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dessa@hexbear.net 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good to see high upvote counts for posts calling this out as BS

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SexMachineStalin@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Quick, someone with a disposable r*ddit account respond by saying "Can we also ban platforms such as Visegrad24 and The Jerusalem Post because Poland and piSSrael respectively are hostile foreign governments" and then follow up by saying you live in any major South African city. Or link a relevant article from Salaamedia/Channel Islam International, maybe it will get called "Hamas/Iranian propaganda". Then when you get banned, call the admin a racist/Boer/Rhodeaboo.

Death to AmeriKKKa, Death to NATO

[–] cyber_godqueen@hexbear.net 28 points 1 day ago
[–] godlessworm@hexbear.net 32 points 1 day ago

thankfully everyone is calling out the china ban. if i wasnt banned from reddit i would be flooding anti work with shit from china out of spite.

[–] Lemister@hexbear.net 30 points 1 day ago

Assimilation into the establishment consensus is the inevitable fate of those that are afraid to appear too "disruptive"

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its not just this sub, there is a whole wave of subs doing this. I don't know if they all are including RedNote and Tiktok thought lol.

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think most are just banning Twitter/X links, that's why it was hilarious to see this ostensibly "left-leaning" sub ban them and call them "CCP-affiliated" :fedposting:

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›