this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
195 points (96.2% liked)

World News

40340 readers
3391 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Colombian President Gustavo Petro said during a government meeting that cocaine is “not worse than whiskey” and that it's only illegal because it comes from Latin America.

Colombia, the world's largest producer and exporter of cocaine, has spent decades fighting drug trafficking, but the country's left-wing president claimed the drug was being scapegoated by American politicians, who have waged the war on drugs for decades.

“Cocaine is illegal because it is made in Latin America, not because it is worse than whiskey,” Petro said during a six-hour-long government meeting.

“Scientists have analyzed this: cocaine is not worse than whiskey,” he added, suggesting that the global cocaine industry could be “easily dismantled” if the drug was legalized worldwide.

The thing is, he's absolutely right. There was a suppressed 1995 study by the World Health Organization on cocaine and its effects. The US threatened to pull out of the WHO at the time since the findings didn't match US drug policy. Instead of losing the US, the WHO quietly shelved the study.

https://www.brucekalexander.com/articles-speeches/cocaine/181-who-cocaine-study

https://web.archive.org/web/20090618160146/www.tdpf.org.uk/WHOleaked.pdf

From the conclusions section:

A continuum can be identified for cocaine use, which includes:

  • experimental use
  • occasional use
  • situation-specific use
  • intensive use
  • compulsive/dysfunctional use

Experimental and occasional use are by far the most common types of use, and compulsive/dysfunctional is far less common. Compulsive or dysfunctional users often have serious relationship, work, legal and health problems.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Is it though? I think it is still worse than alcohol, but I do think decriminalizing can be better for treating and caring for the addicts. Addicts aren't criminals, they are sick and need help.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

99% of my drug problems are law related.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 6 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I am against drugs. I think no one should be using drugs. I think drugs like Alcohol, Meth and Cocaine are a making of the devil. Ideally drugs would only be used as medicine.

None of the problems related to drug use are solved by criminalization. None of the societal and personal problems leading to drug use are solved by criminalization. Instead they are made worse. The most reliable way to reduce drug use in society is by removing economic hardship and lack of opportunities from people and providing better support to people in difficult emotional situations. The most reliable way to help existing drug users to stop using, is by reducing harms associated with drug use, while working on improving their life situation.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 4 points 2 hours ago

Really ? the devil ? We agree on the fact that legalization would go a long way in encouraging safe use. However you seem to be under the impression that drugs are solely used as a getaway from hardships of life. Let me know if I got that wrong. In any case, plenty of users find drugs to be entertaining, eye-opening, tranquilizing, or otherwise interesting or helpful in a variety of other ways. I think it's important to remember that many drugs are just part of nature; plants, mushrooms. They're god's creation.

[–] Lumiluz@slrpnk.net 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

Just wanted to point out, of the three you mentioned, cocaine is still used in medicine, especially in dentistry. You may in fact even have used an analog yourself that's pretty common: Lidocaine

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 4 points 4 hours ago

Cocaine, like, regular chemical cocaine, is also used as a vasopressor (think Epinephrine) in Europe.

Alcohol - meaning Ethanol - is also used in medicine due its antimicrobial properties though. I believe the medical-grade mouthwash I used after my wisdom teeth were removed contained some ethanol, though I'm unsure because I didn't memorize the ingredients.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Using Cocaine as a local anesthetic is very different from use aimed at psychoactive stimulation. E.g. having a small dosage injected in your gums vs. snorthing/smoking/IV use. I wonder though, how often it has to be used instead of lidocaine in practice.

We have the same issue with opiates, where the medical use is crucial, but the problems of abuse are also very strong. However while the physical addiction is extremely strong with opiates, it seems that many of the associated problems are particularly strong due to criminalization. E.g. people with chronic pains who receive opiates permanently can life a somewhat normal life, despite a physical dependence having developed. Programs that provide clean heroin to addicts have been very successful in mitigating a lot of the harm.

People who are high on Cocaine, Meth or Alcohol constantly will cause problems to themselves and others. The Ego-boost and inhibition reduction destroy peoples character. You also have regular reports from heroine users, that their local drug scene got much more problematic, when there was a wave of crack coming in.

[–] Lumiluz@slrpnk.net 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Possibly true, but also a lot of the reports for issues caused by cocaine use lump cocaine with all of its derivatives, including things like crack cocaine. Rarely is pure cocaine affordably sold in the black market.

It would be as fair as combining statistics for oxycodone and tramadol.

I don't think cocaine is as dangerous as it's usually thought of from what I've read. Still dangerous enough to be age restricted and regulated for sure, but also in the right doses about as harmful as cigarettes (except cigarettes also harm those nearby)

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 2 points 6 hours ago

Crack isn't a derivative of Cocaine. powdered Cocaine is typically the HCl salt. Crack is the free base, which makes it soluble for IV injection or smokeable. Because of the "direct" connection to the bloodstream it works much quicker and harder with a shorter duration. But it is the same active chemical compound.

As for recreational Cocaine use, i have witnessed many people falling into addiction w.o. realizing it. Typically it would go like this: Only at Festivals -> only in the club -> yeah birthday home party -> We are all very drunk at the bar, what if we call a dealer to extend the evening? -> i brought some to the bar already, so we don't have to find a dealer this time -> i'm bored at home...

Cocaine is especially dangerous in this regards because it is "smoother", the effects don't last as long as for other stimulants and in lower dosages it can go below the radar of people unfamiliar with drug use, whereas people on amphetamine are more easy to spot already from their physical appearance under the influence.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

Trump Monkey Paw USA: Bans Whiskey again

[–] mat@jlai.lu 49 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

With the legalization of drugs, you can also tax it to finance addiction care and prevention, and by offering legal ways for dealers and producers to go legal, you can probably reduce violence. I see it as a double win.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I read some time ago that drug producers often don't want it to be legal. They make a lot more money when it's illegal.

But yes, I believe it would help.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 5 points 9 hours ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4L20t8Dvlg

"Prison Song"

They're tryna' build a prison
They're tryna' build a prison
Oh

Following the rights movements, you clamped down with your iron fists
Drugs became conveniently available for all the kids
Following the rights movements, you clamped down with your iron fists
Drugs became conveniently available for all the kids

I buy my crack, I smack my bitch
Right here in Hollywood
Nearly two million Americans are incarcerated
In the prison system, prison system of the U.S.

They're tryna' build a prison
They're tryna' build a prison
They're tryna' build a prison
They're tryna' build a prison
For you and me to live in
Another prison system
Another prison system
Another prison system
For you and me

Minor drug offenders fill your prisons, you don't even flinch
All our taxes paying for your wars against the new non-rich
Minor drug offenders fill your prisons, you don't even flinch
All our taxes paying for your wars against the new non-rich

[Chorus]

Oh, oh
All research and successful drug policy
Shows that treatment should be increased
Oh
And law enforcement decreased
While abolishing mandatory minimum sentences
Oh
All research and successful drug policy
Shows that treatment should be increased
Oh
And law enforcement decreased
While abolishing mandatory minimum sentences
Utilizing drugs to pay for secret wars around the world
Drugs are now your global policy, now you police the globe

...
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Even Milton "Shock Doctrine" Friedman was against the drug war.

Friedman: I see America with half the number of prisons, half the number of prisoners, ten thousand fewer homicides a year, inner cities in which there’s a chance for these poor people to live without being afraid for their lives, citizens who might be respectable who are now addicts not being subject to becoming criminals in order to get their drug, being able to get drugs for which they’re sure of the quality. You know, the same thing happened under prohibition of alcohol as is happening now.

Under prohibition of alcohol, deaths from alcohol poisoning, from poisoning by things that were mixed in with the bootleg alcohol, went up sharply. Similarly, under drug prohibition, deaths from overdose, from adulterations, from adulterated substances have gone up.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That's the problem. For-profit prisons exist.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 8 points 16 hours ago

Let's not forget that slavery is allowed to exist as a form of punishment in the US.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The US threatened to pull out of the WHO at the time since the findings didn’t match US drug policy. Instead of losing the US, the WHO quietly shelved the study.

Time to release it then.

[–] krelvar@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If you haven't already read it, check out Chasing the Scream by Johann Hari.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

This book is brilliant, but the last 10% accounted for 90% of my time with the book.

The whole thing is so engaging and interesting and the last bit is a slog

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Whoa whoa whoa. Cocaine is way better than whiskey.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Found Sterling Archer’s fediverse account

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 9 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

Okay, but the combination of coke and alcohol dramatically increases your risk for a heart attack, so having both really available is potentially an even worse health crisis.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If drugs are legal, education on such stuff could be done in schools, just like sexual education.

It also allows people to be honest about their usage in case of heart problems. For example, I live in a country where you can simply tell your doctor or hospital about drugs in your system and they will not call the police for it. It's much safer.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

just like sexual education.

Not off to a great start there for ~~a major part of the~~ soon to be the entire USA 😉

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

USA only has 4.2% of the world population. And the article is about the Columbian president and his stance.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 57 minutes ago)

It's also about how the US threatened to pull out of the WHO over the report.

Edit: Sorry, the summary had someones opinion on that matter, not the actual article.

[–] Lumiluz@slrpnk.net 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

And the risk of alcohol and cars dramatically increases your risk of death and yet...

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 3 points 5 hours ago

I know, it's such a shame there's never been a campaign to inform people about the risks of drunk driving... /s

[–] Donjamos@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

If both were legal you could educate people about them way better. Give your fellow men some more credit.

If someone who has been informed about the dangers of a drug decides to take it its neither your business nor mine. If someone wants to go free climbing or drove a motorcycle we don't say anything against that either.

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I think ethically, legal status should not be a barrier to education about drugs. Sadly, in reality it often is (this includes research as well).

I'm not advocating for intrusive policing, if that's what you think. The system we have now in many places is horribly broken and abusive. Instead I'm saying we should decriminalize but keep policies that are essential to public health (e.g. don't give hard drugs to children), provide better resources for doctors and other healthcare workers, and deliver robust (and scientifically accurate) informational campaigns.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

And so doesn't having prescription medication and booze, yet those are completely commonplace with people. We trust them to use them responsibly. Some do abuse them yes, but if they're caught, we try to fix the issue. Not throw them in jail.

Well more the risk with pills and booze is actually the autonomic nervous system getting sedated and you just not breathing after falling asleep. But the amounts for ods are actually kinda high tbh. Not that anyone should do that, we exaggerate risks a tiny bit for a proper purpose; you shouldn't go seeking for your personal limits on something like that.

But like having a half of a mild sedative before a few classes of wine really isn't drug abuse in anything but the technical sense. If you do that every night you've prolly got a problem though.

Anyway the point is most people can be responsible and the government should stop treating us as children just because a minority can't handle their shit.

Edit also I don't use coke never really saw the point as I'm an overconfident and energetic asshole even without it so idk why the fuck id pay so much for something I already have. Have tried several times but just not my thing. And it was good face numbing shit. But I do advocate for legalising it. I'd so like to have a coke with the original recipe.

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 0 points 11 hours ago

Prescription meds generally aren't party drugs. At least not the ones I know about. So that's not quite the same.

[–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

ok but having a [INSERT THING HERE] dramatically increases your risk for [FUTURE HEALTH ISSUE].

fuck punishing someone for ingesting a substance, im an adult and in control of my own body, silly shit.

actually youre right, i am not in control of my body. Institutions of control will always be forcing their will upon me.

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Oh, I 100% believe that drugs should be decriminalized and treated as a health issue instead. Meaning both individual health and public health. Like how Portugal does it, IIRC.

Booze and cocaine are both party drugs and people already use them together, but I think there's a larger public health concern if they were both readily available because that population would spike. People should have a little more knowledge of the risks. Plenty of folks out there think uppers + downers just cancel out 🙄 We don't need more 20-somethings in the morgue.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Alcohol is one of the worst substances to get addicted to. All the people I've known who did cocaine on occasion were incredibly productive & successful. But the alcohol, it ruined so many marriages & lives.

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

You are making a false equivalence when you compare alcoholics to casual cocaine users. You should compare alcoholics and cocaine addicts.

[–] Oneser@lemm.ee 6 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Cocaine has also ruined many lives. Both are horrible and some people cannot control their consumption.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Both can be horrible.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Much less lives than alcohol though.

[–] Nythos@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 hours ago

How much of that is just due to how massively available alcohol is though?

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago

Fuck it. Might as well at this point.

load more comments
view more: next ›