this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
73 points (94.0% liked)

Casual Conversation

2374 readers
293 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] douglasg14b@beehaw.org 6 points 2 weeks ago

I'm strangely good at catching things intuitively (??).

Like, if my kid throws something at me, I can catch it without looking at it. Almost every time, it's fun

[–] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Back in uni I discovered I can titrate perfectly. Normally you have to do at least 5 or 6 titrations and average the ones that match closest, but I never needed more than 2; A rough titration to get a ballpark figure, then a second to get the exact volume. Any more after that only ever confirmed the first figure.
My professor didn't believe me the first time I came up to her and said my 2 measurements were identical, so told me to do it again in front of her. I produced the same measurement again, and she said she'd never seen anyone do that before, but I'd still have to do at least 3 measurements each time for my coursework.

Unfortunately I've never titrated anything since leaving uni.

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 3 points 2 weeks ago

I am also pretty good at rating tits

[–] three@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

I can make a water droplet sound with my mouth. At first I had to flick my cheek to do it effectively, but nowadays I can do it sneakily without. Great head turner in waiting rooms 😅

[–] guaraguaito@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I can solve a Rubik’s Cube in under 15 seconds. (I had an obsessive phase as a teenager). I don’t think I’ve ever used that skill in my adult life, but they are fun figet toys for when I’m stressed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] diemartin@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I can detect whether apples are "sandy" (or whatever the actual term is for when they have that fugly apple meat that feels like eating sand) or not.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think most people can. Or do you mean without biting into it?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] toomanypancakes@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I play the drums, but not in a band or anything. It's pretty useless, but I'm glad I got good enough I could just play along with random songs and have fun at home. I didn't stick with any other instrument I've tried to learn, so I'm pretty proud of myself to still be at it after twenty years.

[–] WittyProfileName2@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

I'm really good at palming coins and doing variations of disappearing coin tricks. Suck at any other form of slight-of-hand but I can make a coin-sized object look like it vanished with remarkable ease and smoothness.

[–] FromPieces@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago

I can handwrite cyphered text as fast as I can write ordinarily. Never have practiced reading the cyphered text though so reading notes that I took in cypher is a pain in the ass...

[–] TC_209@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I can clap with one hand. In fact, I can one-hand clap with both hands at the same time!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

I can wiggle my little toes independently.

[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

I know the lyrics of Bohemian Rhapsody.

[–] stelelor@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

I can make two sounds that I haven't been able to locate in the IPA chart. They're a voiced and voiceless pair. I can only describe then as the sounds of a goose or duck.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›