this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
537 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19104 readers
4014 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The congresswoman quipped that in attempting to avert a shutdown Republicans were “run[ning] around the House like a Roomba, until they found a door that House Democrats opened”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 134 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I can’t believe no one has enough dirt on Matt Gaetz (and MTG and the rest) to keep them in line. If nothing else, threaten to keep putting junior high schools within 500 ft of Gaetz’s house so he has to move every 3 months. You don’t whip votes with policy arguments.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They HAD dirt. Then it was exposed - and nothing came of it. Now they think they are invincible, even if people have dirt.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I suspect that to rub elbows with the upper echelons of republican leadership, you have to give up some juicy dirt they can use to control or get rid of you. I mean that's the only explanation of Madison Cawthorne. That guy was awful but once he let slip about orgies and shit he was gone quicker than you could say news cycle.

I think the problem is Matt is threatening scorched earth and they believe him. Use any dirt to keep him in line and he'll spill all the beans and bring down the whole party. Because everyone knows these trumpets don't give two shits about the republican party.

[–] swab148@startrek.website 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Didn't he get busted blowing his cousin or something?

That was Cawthorne

Gaetz trafficked a 17 year old hooker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alcyoneous@midwest.social 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they’re just so shameless that no amount of dirt will stick to them

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, look at Beobert. A scandal that big, on video, would have resulted in an instant resignation 20 years ago. But she's so vile that everyone just shrugs and moves on, because it's not even surprising, just funny.

[–] Acronymesis@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is so true I didn’t even realize how fucking upside down the whole thing is until reading your comment. It didn’t even occur to me the idea of her resignation over Beetlegate because the idea of her doing so is just outside the realm of reality. It’s just “oh sorry, I let my morals lapse there for a bit, my bad!” and no one bats an eye.

This is fucking crazy! This is from the party of “gotta protect the kids”, just groping and fondling at a family event!

What the fuck.

[–] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Groping, fondling and vaping. Don't forget the vaping.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

They're all like the Teflon Don. It doesn't matter how dirty you get em, it slides right off, into their supporters mouths. They swallow that filth, smile and come back for more.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

The reason it seems no one is keeping them in line is because they ALL have done the same shit As these two. So leverage is even across the entire GOP which means there is no leverage to use a giant one another.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dmonzel@lemmy.world 105 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm going to have to disagree with her. My Roomba is a lot more intelligent and composed than the House GOP seems to be.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

She's not totally off-base. They're like a Roomba that found the dog poop during the night.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

And smeared it all over the living room carpet

[–] drekly@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

From experience, they need to make those things easier to clean

[–] camr_on@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Mine always gets lost and hides under the couch instead of returning. If only McCarthy would do the same

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, u gotta sympathize with McCarthy here. Ur Roomba just has to suck in trash. McCarthy has to suck trash and make sure it orgasms.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pelosi told the caucus that McCarthy was not to be trusted before the vote. Kevin’s gonna regret breaking his deal with Biden while also making it impossible to stay in power without a decent number of democrats. Just let the cannibals eat each other, seems to be the attitude.

[–] harpuajim@lemmy.ml 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They guy thinks he's much smarter than he actually is. He's good at complaining about things but then it comes to actual leadership he falls flat on his face simply because he's not smart enough to do the job effectively. People here hate Nancy Pelosi but she was unbelievably effective at keeping the party together when it came to important legislation that they wanted passed.

[–] clearedtoland@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I know I’m stepping into murky waters here. I do believe McCarthy is a weak speaker because he can’t keep his party under thumb.

But I’m also struggling to reconcile that they came up with a bipartisan bill (granted, not a longterm one). No one gets everything they want. Isn’t that what we want balanced and working government to do?

[–] Unaware7013@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But I’m also struggling to reconcile that they came up with a bipartisan bill (granted, not a longterm one). No one gets everything they want.

They only did it at the 11th hour, and probably only because their donors were leaning hard on them because a shutdown would fuck up their money, along with another possible credit rating downgrade

Isn’t that what we want balanced and working government to do?

Yes, but functional and working governments do so with reasonable deadlines and well ahead of the "fuck, we're literally out of money" point. Problem is, the republicans thrive on dysfunction and are more than willing to burn things down to hurt people, go back on agreements, and explicitly state how they don't want a functional government.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

I’m also struggling to reconcile that they came up with a bipartisan bill

That's because they didn't. They decided to extend last year's bill 45 more days.

[–] diablexical@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Congress already passed the budget. This is just the party of “government doesn’t work” trying to prove it can’t work by breaking things.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So get this. Gaetz wants to oust McCarthy as Speaker for working with Democrats on the shutdown deal. That will take a majority vote in the House, and Gaetz doesn't have enough Republicans behind him to do that. Thus, Gaetz would have to work with Democrats to oust McCarthy for working with Democrats.

Gaetz has handed Democrats the opportunity to be kingmaker. Their question is if they want to keep someone who will sometimes work across the isle to get shit done, or if they want to help Republicans implode by letting the howler monkey contingent run wild in the leadup to a major election year.

The fact that Gaetz apparently doesn't see this shows that he doesn't have the political savvy for the job. Can't think more than one step ahead in 1D checkers.

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Let McCarthy embarrass himself with 15-20 votes that fall short, THEN play kingmaker. Put Jon Huntsman, John Kasich, or some other moderate in as speaker. The Constitution doesn't require the speaker to be a member of Congress.

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When is this woman running for president? Like seriously, seems like a legitimate decent choice

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

She has zero chance of winning a general election. She's getting the Hilary treatment from Republicans. That is - they're vilifying her right now to poison people against her before she can run.

The only reason Trump became President is because the Democrats ran an unelectable candidate against him. They spent over 20 years making Hilary the villain, and it allowed them to install the worst President in US history.

And they're prepping for AOC to be the next Clinton.

[–] Appleseuss@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They fuckin did Bernie wrong.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Devious_Thoughts@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can they even put anyone else in is my question.

Does Kevin McCarthy work with Democrats and his Republicans to stay as speaker

Or do Republicans backstab McCarthy and vote a Democrat speaker.

Idk but I don't imagine regular Republicans voting in a Democrat speaker, and this story is telling me that Democrats won't support Kevin either 🤷🏽

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can they even put anyone else in is my question.

HAKEEEEEEEEEEEM JEFFRIES!

[–] Devious_Thoughts@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol yes, the house minority leader would be the obvious Democrat choice, but will Republicans vote for him is the issue.

I personally don't think so 🤷🏽

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DoomBot5@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

That's how you end up spending the next 45 days trying to elect a new speaker instead of passing a budget.

load more comments
view more: next ›