this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
188 points (99.5% liked)

Political Memes

6355 readers
3582 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PassingThrough@lemm.ee 100 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is the future they want.

Why get warnings for “free”(tax funded) through a costly government service when you can get warnings for $19.99 per month, with annual price hikes for “inflation”. EULA declares warnings are not guaranteed, and subscription is non-refundable.

Won’t someone think of the C-Suite and defund NOAA and NWS already?!? /s

[–] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Don't worry, Republicans already have that as a goal in their Project 2025. They said the NWS should only gather data and all forecasting should be commercialized. Also that no data support ant side of the "climate debate". It'll get here soon enough, once musk companies are protected from safety investigations.

[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world 62 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Is this satire? Its hard to tell these days.

[–] Goun@lemmy.ml 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Our premium users already know if this is stire or not. Why don't you join them?

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 weeks ago

Don't be a dick... here you go OP:

[Content visible only to Lemmy Gold subscribers. Buy a 12 month tokens bundle and get 10% off!]

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This 16 minute John Oliver piece should be required viewing regarding weather information: https://youtu.be/qMGn9T37eR8

[–] Quik@infosec.pub 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

FYI Trump made the CEO of the company AccuWeather, Neil Jacobs, administrator of NOAA, which is the agency actually collecting weather data. AccuWeather is one of the biggest private competitors to NOAA, and this is obviously a huge conflict of interest.

For anyone interested to learn more about the topic, check out Michael Lewis' book The Fifth Risk.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's also frustrating when so many weather apps just repackage freely available NOAA data into more user friendly presentations and charge for it. If I was being optimistic I'd say they'd make NOAA more user friendly but I'm not.

[–] plenipotentprotogod@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

FYI: The American Red Cross has a pretty nice (and completely free) app that'll send you push notifications for all kinds of different emergencies.

You can set up multiple locations to monitor (in addition to your live location) and select which types of emergency events you want to hear about for each one.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.cube.arc.hzd

[–] bravesirrbn@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Wait until Trump and Elon hear about this

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What a fucking dystopian world: copyrighted tools to detect natural dangerous events..

Like, pay us or die. Seems like blackmailing to me..

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Weather alerts are FREE! Jesus people, you'll believe anything that falls in line with your outlook.

Just got this, for FREE. Take a look at that pic, notice all the FREE options for weather alerts? My FREE weather app gives me alerts.

If people are dumb enough to pay, I got no problem taking their money.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They're only free because NOAA publishes the information for free. Several private interest groups (companies) have been pushing to cut off public distribution so that people have to pay them to get access to severe weather alerts. Like, deliberate, targeted enshittification; no value adding, literally just inserting a paywall.

[–] por_que_pine@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

Come on; it won't be that bad. Just watch the 30 second add to get to the critical information. Don't forget to do the captchas and dodge the popups. /s

[–] jared@mander.xyz 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So how about a federated weather service.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

The NOAA's data already is crowdsourced. (Technically not the same as "federated," but similar ethos.) Accuweather is trying to steal it.

More info:
https://www.weather.gov/iln/cwop
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/land-based-station/cooperative-observer-network

And, insanely, archive links because this is the worst fucking timeline:

https://web.archive.org/web/20250210082537/https://www.weather.gov/iln/cwop
https://web.archive.org/web/20250207182410/https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/land-based-station/cooperative-observer-network

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 7 points 2 weeks ago

This is how it started too! People sharing observations over letters and then telegraph.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

~~Because screenshots of social media posts are not journalism:~~

Actually, I'll restate that. Because people tend to believe screenshots of social media posts as gospel truth even though they are not journalism:

The link displayed in the image redirects to

https://www.accuweather.com/en/case-studies/accuweathers-life-saving-tornado-warning-10-minutes-ahead-of-nws-in-tennessee/1743254?hss_channel=lcp-162257

Which doesn't load, with or without the ?hss... part.

I'm not finding the X post by Accuweather, because the scroll only goes back to August 2024 so far as I can tell. However, this appears to stem from a May 8, 2024 storm

Plenty more of their patting themselves on the back here.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The page is cached by Kagi, but not in the web archives.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, I restated my first sentence, because I'm not throwing shade on you at all.

If I was going to throw shade on you, it would be for failing to embed Saddam Hussein in the image.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 8 points 2 weeks ago

That's reserved for special occasions.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, Watch Duty once binged and would have woken me up at 2:15AM for an evacuation, had my neighbor not pounded on my window at 2AM as the fire roared down the hillside toward our town. We got lucky.