389

To save you a click: Victoria Spartz (R-IN)

See ya, Vicky.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 151 points 1 year ago

If she was really serious, she'd put forth a resolution to repeal the 2017 tax laws that gave $1.5 trillion to the ultra wealthy, increase corporations taxes to pre Reagan days, and individuals taxes to Eisenhowers day.

Other than that, fuck right off you Mewling Quim.

[-] HomebrewHedonist@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 year ago

I wish more people thought like you do. This is exactly how we go here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Cylusthevirus@kbin.social 120 points 1 year ago

These people really don't understand the difference between household budgets and sovereign nations, do they? Does she think a bank is going to repo an aircraft carrier or something?

[-] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago

They really don't and if you tried to explain it they would ignore you and change the subject.

[-] blivet@artemis.camp 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Exactly. I learned that it is a waste of time to try to have a discussion with this kind of person way back in the 80s. They’re willfully ignorant.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

They largely don't understand the role of government spending in the economy. These folks barely understand econ 101.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 92 points 1 year ago

Get rid of the debt ceiling and move those debates to where they belong, in the budget.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 84 points 1 year ago
  1. Someone tell this worthless person that national debt does not work like personal debt, and that the debt of the world's reserve currency is even more different.

  2. As a Republican, you're not saving the Republic at all, bless your heart.

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 28 points 1 year ago

Resigning would be the closest any republican gets to “saving the republic.”

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 78 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So she's upset that Republicans passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in 2017 under Trump that added $2.289 trillion in new national debt, right? Right?!

[-] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

You just don't understand. Tax cuts allowed job creators to create more jobs. Tax cuts are like printing money for everyone in the whole country. Do you know what we need to solve the debt crisis? More tax cuts! Maybe we eliminate the IRS altogether.

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Veraticus@lib.lgbt 48 points 1 year ago
[-] FancyManacles@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

I live in her district. She is an obvious Russian agent. I got a call from her campaign before her first election and they asked me "How important is improving trade and diplomatic relations between the US and Russia to you as a voter?"

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] detalferous@lemm.ee 43 points 1 year ago

If Congress does not pass a debt commission this year to move the needle on the crushing national debt and inflation, at least at the next debt ceiling increase at the end of 2024, I will not continue sacrificing my children for this circus

Ahh. So she's one of the child sacrifice Republicans

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 year ago

Arent they all? They're pro birth because you need em alive for the sacrifice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 36 points 1 year ago

I'd prefer that she self-immolate on the floor of congress. Make a real statement.

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

Nothing says “I’m serious” like self-immolation.

[-] ForestOrca@kbin.social 34 points 1 year ago

"I will not continue sacrificing my children for this circus", I'm really glad for her remaining children. smh

[-] Jerkface@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If Congress does not pass a debt commission this year to move the needle on the crushing national debt and inflation, at least at the next debt ceiling increase at the end of 2024...

She is priming for public support to force the US to default. This will be either to extract concessions from opposition in Congress (like a hostage negotiation), or to create a global economic catastrophe. Or both.

Of course, she will not resign. She swears a false oath. This was a winning strategy for them in June. Naturally, they will try it again.

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

She won’t resign. It’s all standard GOP theatrics.

[-] Introversion@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

Unless she finds a better-paying gig on OAN.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago

Every Republican who resigns from politics should be given a check from Crime Stoppers

[-] joneskind@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Good. Resign then

[-] UtMan1988@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Boy, that picture of her is a meme diamond in the rough. You can see her lizard skin poking through the human costume!

[-] TwoGems@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Good, resign and have a stroke

[-] Vaggumon@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago
[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 18 points 1 year ago
[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago

Right, you promise??

[-] fruitleatherpostcard@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

Don’t let the door hit…. Uh… Scratch that.

Perhaps a minor concussion might improve her though processes.

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Do it!

(She won't do it)

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

She’s trying to become an anchor on Fox, I guarantee it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ala@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

it's 50-50 without clicking through that she's trying to save us by a) voting to raise debt ceiling or b) voting against raising debt ceiling.

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

It's worse, she wants us to end government spending (you know that pesky Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, social security, welfare, food stamps...but not defense spending, go figure). And since she's a rich Republican she can't see the glaring solution of taxing the ridiculously fucking rich people to make up the difference. So she's throwing a little temper tantrum. And the democrats are eating popcorn and watching as the GOP sets their hair on fire. 😂

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Goddamn she’s overdramatic.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Why so much wailing over debt? I bet people like this Karen would have their heads explode if they were made to learn about MMT.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Minarble@aussie.zone 12 points 1 year ago

Bye Felicia

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 12 points 1 year ago

Please go full ashli babbit.

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

Don’t threaten everyone with a good time…

[-] rynzcycle@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

and our children will be ashamed of another worthless Congress.

Asked further what she thought about global warming, Spartz yelled, "YOLO" and shotgunned a tallboy of PBR.

[-] brawleryukon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago
[-] reallynotnick@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

at least at the next debt ceiling increase at the end of 2024

Yeah, so basically long enough that nobody is going to remember this and she is going to George Costanza her way back into the office.

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Sparz is probably looking for reasons to resign since she barely got 50% in a House district Republicans have held for decades.

[-] redmoon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

One has to wonder if she approved of the 2 trillion trump/gop tax cuts.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

GTFO Vick. kthnxbye.

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Rep. Spartz also swears to unfollow you guys if you don't listen to her. She swears.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

"... but that is a sacrifice I'm willing to make."

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Where were you during the Trump debt-a-paloza years? (Checks political history) Oh, you hadn't been elected yet.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
389 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4642 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS